X-Message-Number: 10267
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 1998 09:59:30 -0400
From: Thomas Donaldson <>
Subject: CryoNet #10249 - #10255

To Chris Fideli:

I can't speak for the others but I myself am glad that you and Peggy
Moore are on Cryonet. If you are interested in the issue of how to 
increase the number of cryonicists, that is indeed an important issue --
more important right now than any amount of discussion of computers.

You may wish to look, first, at past discussions in Cryonet on this
question (see the discussion which precedes every Cryonet). No sense
in repeating old ideas.

I will say myself that it is a difficult task, for reasons I do not
claim to understand. (Some DO claim to understand, but then you get
to work out if they're right). Cryonet does not just contain computer
discussions... but you must be patient with us. And I gave my own 
ideas about the relation of Goedel to cryonics in my last message
which is on the same issue of Cryonet which has your piece and that
of Kennita.

			Best and long long life,

				Thomas Donaldson

Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=10267