X-Message-Number: 10267 Date: Tue, 18 Aug 1998 09:59:30 -0400 From: Thomas Donaldson <> Subject: CryoNet #10249 - #10255 To Chris Fideli: I can't speak for the others but I myself am glad that you and Peggy Moore are on Cryonet. If you are interested in the issue of how to increase the number of cryonicists, that is indeed an important issue -- more important right now than any amount of discussion of computers. You may wish to look, first, at past discussions in Cryonet on this question (see the discussion which precedes every Cryonet). No sense in repeating old ideas. I will say myself that it is a difficult task, for reasons I do not claim to understand. (Some DO claim to understand, but then you get to work out if they're right). Cryonet does not just contain computer discussions... but you must be patient with us. And I gave my own ideas about the relation of Goedel to cryonics in my last message which is on the same issue of Cryonet which has your piece and that of Kennita. Best and long long life, Thomas Donaldson Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=10267