X-Message-Number: 10349 Date: Sun, 30 Aug 1998 10:09:37 -0400 From: Bozzonetti <> Subject: Re: # 10346, Revival time estimates by R. Ettinger R. Ettinger wrote: >I thought I had posted a couple of comments on Jeff Davis' #10333 "Near >certainty of success of cryonics," but apparently only sent the addendum=2E = > >First, Arthur Rowe's notorious sound bite about reviving a frozen person being >as difficult as turning hamburger back into a cow: As I have pointed out >before, this is a plain and conscious lie. Many lower animals have been >revived after freezing, none after grinding. > There is an interesting fact in Rowe's idea: He said into a cow, not the original cow! Today, genetic clones may indeed be built from DNA taken from hamburger if we want. So, if cryonics was that simple we would have perfect recovery today. .. May be it is that simple, but cloning has got more money and that is why it is a reality today. Yvan Bozzonetti. Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=10349