X-Message-Number: 10528
From: "Thomas Nord" <>
Subject: Long life and CO2?
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 1998 02:46:21 +0200

Detta  r ett multipart-meddelande i MIME-format.

------=_NextPart_000_01BDF00A.56074C60
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Someone mentioned the CATO institute proofing there might not be any
danger. We have a similar institute here, also paid by the big bucks and
proofing with onesided investigations and information. Just take a look at
their links! Greenpeace and such have to chase the small bucks. Money talks
sadly. The fossil-fuel-industry are of course paying for a lot of lobbying.
One US org. homepage talks against regulations and have a 1000$ lottery for
those who send an e-mail to the president thru them on the issue!
Who are most likely to think longterm or make big bucks?

On the other hand we have i e UN's IPCC (the climate-panel) with i.e. an
swedish chairman professor em Bert Bolin of the Stockholm University, where
they have independent taxpaid objective serious research in the issue, with
all the facts on the net. 

If the G.-effect has hit us yet takes some more damaging years to proof.
The simple fact is our globe has had normal variations a long time, but
without
the new greenhouse-gases. CO2 is new, do not dissapear and will disrupt the
normal
state without doubt. Those who like big gamble with human life, sit back
and laugh. The rest of us cant.

As long as the Cryonet arent loaded with lots of purely academic
Cryonic-issues, more or less boring for some, our related matters seem in
place. If it overloads, perhaps a split?

(Carl) Thomas Nord
Independent, retired at relatively young age with medium own big bucks put
in my foundation then.

------=_NextPart_000_01BDF00A.56074C60
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1

[ AUTOMATICALLY SKIPPING HTML ENCODING! ] 

Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=10528