X-Message-Number: 10528 From: "Thomas Nord" <> Subject: Long life and CO2? Date: Mon, 5 Oct 1998 02:46:21 +0200 Detta r ett multipart-meddelande i MIME-format. ------=_NextPart_000_01BDF00A.56074C60 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Someone mentioned the CATO institute proofing there might not be any danger. We have a similar institute here, also paid by the big bucks and proofing with onesided investigations and information. Just take a look at their links! Greenpeace and such have to chase the small bucks. Money talks sadly. The fossil-fuel-industry are of course paying for a lot of lobbying. One US org. homepage talks against regulations and have a 1000$ lottery for those who send an e-mail to the president thru them on the issue! Who are most likely to think longterm or make big bucks? On the other hand we have i e UN's IPCC (the climate-panel) with i.e. an swedish chairman professor em Bert Bolin of the Stockholm University, where they have independent taxpaid objective serious research in the issue, with all the facts on the net. If the G.-effect has hit us yet takes some more damaging years to proof. The simple fact is our globe has had normal variations a long time, but without the new greenhouse-gases. CO2 is new, do not dissapear and will disrupt the normal state without doubt. Those who like big gamble with human life, sit back and laugh. The rest of us cant. As long as the Cryonet arent loaded with lots of purely academic Cryonic-issues, more or less boring for some, our related matters seem in place. If it overloads, perhaps a split? (Carl) Thomas Nord Independent, retired at relatively young age with medium own big bucks put in my foundation then. ------=_NextPart_000_01BDF00A.56074C60 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 [ AUTOMATICALLY SKIPPING HTML ENCODING! ] Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=10528