X-Message-Number: 1054 Date: 23 Jul 92 23:00:33 EDT From: "Steven B. Harris" <> Subject: Clinical vs Legal Death Lola McCrary says: >> I incline towards "legal death", especially since the definition of "clinical death" does, as pointed out, keep changing. << Comment: if somebody pointed that out, they were wrong. The definition of "clinical death" stays the same, while it is the definition of LEGAL death which keeps changing. "Clinical" comes from a Greek word meaning bed, and refers in the practice of medicine to work done at the bedside with ordinary physician's tools (as opposed to work done in the lab, or with fancy mac- hines). Thus, "clinical death" is diagnosed with a stethoscope and a penlight. EEG machines and angiography play no part in it, though they may (or may not) play a role in the definition of legal death in some places and under some circumstances. Please note that the Venn diagram of "legal death" and "clinical death" is one of two partly intersecting circles. Some people are clinically dead but not legally dead (i.e., all those who haven't been pronounced, and even a few who are going to be yet resuscitated); some people are legally dead but not clin- ically dead (i.e., brain dead people on ventilators who've been pronounced); and finally some people are BOTH legally dead and clinically dead. Cryonics in practice requires legal death (the last time cryonicists began the procedure with a patient who was clinically dead but not yet legally dead, a lot of people got into a lot of trouble). So far, all cryonics patients have been clinically dead at the start of the procedure as well, but there is no reason to think that this may always be the case. As terms, legal death and clinical death each have problems, and which one you use depends on the job you want to do. Legal death, of course, does not describe an objective state-- it merely represents some kind of formal social stamp of approval. Thus a person is REALLY legally dead only in the sense that he is REALLY married, or REALLY a doctor. Clinical death, on the other hand, describes a more objective phenomenon: circulatory cessa- tion, implying (at higher temperatures) rapid ischemic damage. It does not imply or require permanent loss of the person, but on the other hand, no one can say just when (objectively) such a thing occurs. Without doubt, in fact, it occurs gradually in most cases as a sort of slow fading. In one sense, all the people that Alcor cares for as patients are not dead, but dying. When the cryonics process starts they were all dying quite fast, but by the time they get to -196 Centigrade, they're dying quite slowly. Steve Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=1054