X-Message-Number: 10881 From: "Olaf Henny" <> Subject: Re: CryoNet Message 10874 Date: Sun, 6 Dec 1998 19:10:40 -0800 >Message #10874 >From: "Ken Barclay" <> >Subject: BioResonance Tumor Therapy > Hi Everybody: I would imagine, that several of us turned to Medline to find out, if there is any substance to that story. Some of you may have been turned off by the statement: "[Alternative treatment methods in ENT]. HNO. 1997 Aug;45(8):593-607. Review. German", in the only hit the search produced. Well the abstract outlining the subjects of the review, which dealt with all kinds of alternate treatment methods was in English, but did not indicate, Dr. Friese's assessment of the efficacy of BioResonance treatments. For now they appear to fall into the category of "Alternate Medicine", with little or no mainstream support. ----------------------------------------------------------- [Alternative treatment methods in ENT]. [Article in German] Friese KH Hals-Nasen-Ohrenarzt, Allergologie, Homoopathie, Stimm- und Sprachstorungen, Naturheilverfahren, Umweltmedizin, Weil der Stadt. In this review, the most important complementary und alternative therapies are discussed, focusing particularly on their use in otorhinolaryngology. These therapies include balneology, Kneipp therapy, microbiological therapy, fasting, excretion therapy, different oxygen therapies, hydro-colon therapy, urine therapy, own-blood therapy, Bach therapy, orthomolecular therapy, order therapy, environmental medicine, phytotherapy, homeopathy, complex homeopathy, anthroposophy, neural therapy, electroaccupuncture according to Voll and similar therapies, nasal reflex therapy, reflex-zone massage, manual therapy, massage, lymph drainage, aroma therapy, thermotherapy, bioresonance, kinesiology, hopi candles, and dietetics. Some of these methods and regimens can be recommended, but others should be rejected. In universities, these methods are only represented to a minor extend, but are more accepted by otorhinolaryngologists in practice. This paper provides a guide to which alternative therapies are sensible and possible in otorhinolaryngology. The aim is to stimulate interest in these methods. It is necessary to discuss these alternative methods reasonably and credibly with patients. Publication Types: Review Review, tutorial PMID: 9378666, UI: 97455029 ------------------------------------------------------ Best, Olaf Date: Sat, 5 Dec 1998 14:48:10 -0800 >>From Ken Barclay > >The following was an addendum to a message on another list. With no real >knowledge of gene therapy, I am not able to evaluate it. If it makes any >scientific sense, though, It certainly seems relevant to cryonic >endeavors: > > > >This is such an important announcement that we are letting people know >about it all over the net. If you know of anyone who is looking for >alternative cancer therapy, have him or her take a look at this web site >http://newhopeclinic.com. or forward this message to them. This is the >most effective new development for the natural elimination of tumors and >their underlying causes yet discovered. > >Deepak Chopra once gave a lecture, in which he said (paraphrased), If we >could understand the mechanism of spontaneous remission in just one case >of cancer we might be able to find the key to successful cancer >treatment. Such an understanding has finally been discovered and a new >method of treating cancer based on this understanding is proving to be >80% successful at stimulating the natural reduction and elimination of >tumors. This process has been developed and perfected over the last five >years in Europe. It is called BioResonance Tumor Therapy and it has an >effect similar to stimulating spontaneous remission. > >Here s how it works. As with all great breakthroughs in science, the best >are based on insights that are penetratingly simple. Such is the case >with this new therapy. It is based on the understanding of how cells >naturally die. Every cell in the human body has a gene called the P53 >gene. This gene tracks the degeneration of the cell and when it finds >that the cell is damaged beyond repair, it triggers its self-destruction. >This active, controlled process of cell death is happening all the time >in all of us. 95% of the cells that are in your body now weren t there 2 >years ago. The old cells died through this natural self-destruction >process that is triggered by the P53 gene. New cells are then created >through cell division. > >What about tumor cells? In tumor cells the function of the P53 gene gets >suppressed. The tumor cells lose the ability to die naturally. This >insight about the P53 gene has led to the development of a new way to >re-enliven the function of the suppressed P53 gene and bring back its >ability to naturally self-destruct the cell upon recognizing that the >cell is degenerate. What this means is that malignant tumors can be >reduced and/or eliminated from the body by re-activating the cell's >suppressed P53 function. The technique for re-enlivening the P53 function >is through a process known as BioResonance Therapy. > >Mr. Keymer s brilliant insight was to shift the thinking from seeing the >tumor cells as the enemy that has to be aggressively killed, to seeing >the tumor cells as weakened normal cells. The therapy that he devised was >to re-energize the tumor cells in order to re-activate the function of >the suppressed P53 gene. With this function re-energized, the tumor cells >recognize their own degenerate state and naturally die on their own. > >There are other factors involved in addition to this underlying >principle. In the surrounding tissue there is another gene called the Myg >gene that sends signals to the surrounding cells to stay alive. In the >tissue surrounding the tumors the Myg gene becomes overactive. Its >activity must be reduced which is also accomplished through BioResonance >Therapy. There are also background toxic stresses that have initially >caused the suppression of the P53 gene. These toxic stresses must be >identified and eliminated also through BioResonance Therapy. Some of >these include viruses, parasites, bacteria, mold, fungus, mercury and >other heavy metals, environmental toxins, electro-magnetic field >stresses, etc. The body s organs, glands and the immune system must also >be strengthened and detoxified. Inevitably, there are emotional or >psychological stresses underlying every tumor. These factors have also >responded very well to BioResonance Therapy. > >80% of cancer patients treated in Germany with this new BioResonance >Therapy approach have recovered successfully. This means that the tumor >has stopped growing, has then gradually or quickly reduced in size and >either stabilized or has been completely eliminated. In addition, because >the underlying toxic stresses that caused the tumor have also been >identified and eliminated, thus far, reoccurrence of the tumor or >development of other tumors has been minimal to non-existent. > >BioResonance Therapy for tumors has been used successfully in Germany >both with and without traditional therapies such as surgery, chemotherapy >and radiation. In fact, in many cases where traditional medical doctors >have given up on patients and told them that they had only a few weeks to >live, the patients started this new BioResonance Therapy for tumors and >within a few months they were tumor free and back in good health. This >has happened not once but over and over again. The average course of >therapy is six weeks with 2 to three treatments per week. The treatments >are non-invasive, completely comfortable and gentle. This is certainly >one of the most encouraging and exciting new developments in the >treatment of cancer. > >This new cancer therapy is coming to North America with the opening of a >clinic in Mexico, just south of San Diego, CA. The New Hope BioResonance >Clinic is taking reservations for six-week treatment programs scheduled >to begin January 1, 1999. The cost of this therapy is substantially less >than that of either traditional cancer treatment or many other >alternative cancer therapies. The clinic is staffed by the most >experienced and successful BioResonance Tumor Therapists in the world. >For more information please see our web site at http://newhopeclinic.com >or call the message line (562) 402-1356 and leave your name, number and >the best time to return your call or e-mail >mailto: The web site contains approximately 80 >pages of information detailing the laboratory research and clinical case >histories of numerous cancer patients as well as contact information for >the clinic. > > > > >[ AUTOMATICALLY SKIPPING HTML ENCODING! ] >------=_NextPart_000_006F_01BE205E.46D484E0 >Content-Type: text/html; > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >Message #10875 >From: "Ken Mayerine" <> >Date: Sat, 5 Dec 1998 16:33:41 +0800 >Subject: The Death of Mark Howard Riegal (and the Gold Standard) > >Dear Fred: > >I'm interested in your article about my uncle Mark's recent death, >and the lethality of scarcity economics and red tape. > >After thinking about your offer to use fictional names and aliases, >I've decided that it would be more useful if you were to use the >actual names. > >Please feel free to write your article using the actual names and >events. > >You'll find, upon researching our family, that there is an >off the shelf modern myth in the making. > >My grandfather, Norbert H. Riegel, is a retired Air Force Colonel. >He was once a minuteman missile launch site commander, and before >that, a World War II B-17 bomber pilot. > >He wrote a book, called "Papa Pete", that chronicles his life story. >There are interesting tidbits in this book, including a letter from >the Pope of the Roman Catholic Church, honoring him for his services. > >Mark was a recording artists who never had the money to promote his >work. He made a tape, called "Mark Riegel: Live in Lompoc", in which >he lyricized his frustration with property taxes, economic injustice, >and establishment idiocy such as licensing requirements for people >who want to camp peacefully at national parks and forests. > >Maybe we could get Mark's music online, and listen to it while >celebrating the death of William Gates II, and William Gates III? I >never thought I'd want to be a cannibal, but in the context of >celebrating my Uncle's adherence to his principles, a little roast >down in Silicon Valley over the demise of monopolistic practices >sounds very tempting. > >I don't think Mark died entirely of natural causes. I think Perry >Towles shot a hole the size of a golf ball in his oversized heart, >for the pupose of getting a discussion started about whether or not >Teledesic would be the kind of gun we'd want in the hands of a robber >baron, like Bill Gates. > >What is the possibility that his wife was one of those "Whoops, >accidental bun in the oven, better get married" killer shop droids >("stick on a stump on a stem"), sent in for a close range kill? A >Blade Runner style, Rachael series. Sweet, Warm, and Loving, till >she reads the words "cull the calf". All genetic blank shop killer >for hire programming. I think she's probably backed up seven ways >from Sunday on QDCM, so even if Perry turned her into a pile >of sawdust shortly after she blew her kids head off in a coked up >mania over her husbands A.W.O.L., she could be returned in time to >do the paperwork for Larry. Splice the genes with some fast growth >tissue, spin up another blank in a jello tank, and she'll be back to >save the day. > >I know Bill didn't like my having the name "Immedia Expert Systems" >back in the old days when I was working as a waiter at "Hawk's Cay". >That must be why he had Adnan Kashogi send his best hooker, James R. >Wilkenson (former Marboro Man), to blow my mind, shoot me up with >Ketamine, and convince me to go to the barefoot hippie dentist to get >my silver fillings out, and replaced with C4 epoxy resin. > >Should we get this Tom Clancy story started now, or what? > >P.S. Thanks to Gail and Dan for eating Bill for dinner. > >------------------- > > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >End of CryoNet Digest >********************* > > Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=10881