X-Message-Number: 10881
From: "Olaf Henny" <>
Subject: Re: CryoNet Message 10874
Date: Sun, 6 Dec 1998 19:10:40 -0800

>Message #10874
>From: "Ken Barclay" <>
>Subject: BioResonance Tumor Therapy
>
Hi Everybody:

 I would imagine, that several of us turned to Medline to find out, if
there is any substance to that story.  Some of you may have been
turned off by the statement:  "[Alternative treatment methods in ENT].
     HNO. 1997 Aug;45(8):593-607. Review. German", in the only hit
the search produced.

Well the abstract outlining the subjects of the review, which dealt with all
 kinds of alternate treatment methods was in English, but did not indicate,
Dr. Friese's assessment of the efficacy of BioResonance treatments.

For now they appear to fall into the category of "Alternate Medicine", with
little or no mainstream support.
-----------------------------------------------------------
[Alternative treatment methods in ENT].

[Article in German]

Friese KH

Hals-Nasen-Ohrenarzt, Allergologie, Homoopathie, Stimm- und
Sprachstorungen, Naturheilverfahren, Umweltmedizin, Weil der Stadt.

In this review, the most important complementary und alternative therapies
are
discussed, focusing particularly on their use in otorhinolaryngology. These
therapies
include balneology, Kneipp therapy, microbiological therapy, fasting,
excretion
therapy, different oxygen therapies, hydro-colon therapy, urine therapy,
own-blood
therapy, Bach therapy, orthomolecular therapy, order therapy, environmental
medicine, phytotherapy, homeopathy, complex homeopathy, anthroposophy,
neural
therapy, electroaccupuncture according to Voll and similar therapies, nasal
reflex
therapy, reflex-zone massage, manual therapy, massage, lymph drainage, aroma
therapy, thermotherapy, bioresonance, kinesiology, hopi candles, and
dietetics.
Some of these methods and regimens can be recommended, but others should be
rejected. In universities, these methods are only represented to a minor
extend,
but are more accepted by otorhinolaryngologists in practice. This paper
provides a
guide to which alternative therapies are sensible and possible in
otorhinolaryngology.
The aim is to stimulate interest in these methods. It is necessary to
discuss these
alternative methods reasonably and credibly with patients.

Publication Types:

     Review
     Review, tutorial

PMID: 9378666, UI: 97455029
------------------------------------------------------
Best,

Olaf






Date: Sat, 5 Dec 1998 14:48:10 -0800
>>From Ken Barclay
>
>The following was an addendum to a message on another list.  With no real
>knowledge of gene therapy, I am not able to evaluate it.  If it makes any
>scientific sense, though, It certainly seems relevant to cryonic
>endeavors:
>
>
>
>This is such an important announcement that we are letting people  know
>about it all over the net. If you know of anyone who is  looking for
>alternative cancer therapy, have him or her take a  look at this web site
>http://newhopeclinic.com. or forward this  message to them. This is the
>most effective new development for  the natural elimination of tumors and
>their underlying causes yet  discovered.
>
>Deepak Chopra once gave a lecture, in which he said  (paraphrased), If we
>could understand the mechanism of  spontaneous remission in just one case
>of cancer we might be able  to find the key to successful cancer
>treatment. Such an  understanding has finally been discovered and a new
>method of  treating cancer based on this understanding is proving to be
>80%  successful at stimulating the natural reduction and elimination  of
>tumors. This process has been developed and perfected over the  last five
>years in Europe. It is called BioResonance Tumor  Therapy and it has an
>effect similar to stimulating spontaneous  remission.
>
>Here s how it works. As with all great breakthroughs in science,  the best
>are based on insights that are penetratingly simple.  Such is the case
>with this new therapy. It is based on the  understanding of how cells
>naturally die. Every cell in the human  body has a gene called the P53
>gene. This gene tracks the  degeneration of the cell and when it finds
>that the cell is  damaged beyond repair, it triggers its self-destruction.
>This  active, controlled process of cell death is happening all the  time
>in all of us. 95% of the cells that are in your body now  weren t there 2
>years ago. The old cells died through this  natural self-destruction
>process that is triggered by the P53  gene. New cells are then created
>through cell division.
>
>What about tumor cells? In tumor cells the function of the P53  gene gets
>suppressed. The tumor cells lose the ability to die  naturally. This
>insight about the P53 gene has led to the  development of a new way to
>re-enliven the function of the  suppressed P53 gene and bring back its
>ability to naturally  self-destruct the cell upon recognizing that the
>cell is  degenerate. What this means is that malignant tumors can be
>reduced and/or eliminated from the body by re-activating the  cell's
>suppressed P53 function. The technique for re-enlivening  the P53 function
>is through a process known as BioResonance  Therapy.
>
>Mr. Keymer s brilliant insight was to shift the thinking from  seeing the
>tumor cells as the enemy that has to be aggressively  killed, to seeing
>the tumor cells as weakened normal cells. The  therapy that he devised was
>to re-energize the tumor cells in  order to re-activate the function of
>the suppressed P53 gene.  With this function re-energized, the tumor cells
>recognize their  own degenerate state and naturally die on their own.
>
>There are other factors involved in addition to this underlying
>principle. In the surrounding tissue there is another gene called  the Myg
>gene that sends signals to the surrounding cells to stay  alive. In the
>tissue surrounding the tumors the Myg gene becomes  overactive. Its
>activity must be reduced which is also  accomplished through BioResonance
>Therapy. There are also  background toxic stresses that have initially
>caused the  suppression of the P53 gene. These toxic stresses must be
>identified and eliminated also through BioResonance Therapy. Some  of
>these include viruses, parasites, bacteria, mold, fungus,  mercury and
>other heavy metals, environmental toxins,  electro-magnetic field
>stresses, etc. The body s organs, glands  and the immune system must also
>be strengthened and detoxified.  Inevitably, there are emotional or
>psychological stresses  underlying every tumor. These factors have also
>responded very  well to BioResonance Therapy.
>
>80% of cancer patients treated in Germany with this new  BioResonance
>Therapy approach have recovered successfully. This  means that the tumor
>has stopped growing, has then gradually or  quickly reduced in size and
>either stabilized or has been  completely eliminated. In addition, because
>the underlying toxic  stresses that caused the tumor have also been
>identified and  eliminated, thus far, reoccurrence of the tumor or
>development of  other tumors has been minimal to non-existent.
>
>BioResonance Therapy for tumors has been used successfully in  Germany
>both with and without traditional therapies such as  surgery, chemotherapy
>and radiation. In fact, in many cases where  traditional medical doctors
>have given up on patients and told  them that they had only a few weeks to
>live, the patients started  this new BioResonance Therapy for tumors and
>within a few months  they were tumor free and back in good health. This
>has happened  not once but over and over again. The average course of
>therapy  is six weeks with 2 to three treatments per week. The treatments
>are non-invasive, completely comfortable and gentle. This is  certainly
>one of the most encouraging and exciting new  developments in the
>treatment of cancer.
>
>This new cancer therapy is coming to North America with the  opening of a
>clinic in Mexico, just south of San Diego, CA. The  New Hope BioResonance
>Clinic is taking reservations for six-week  treatment programs scheduled
>to begin January 1, 1999. The cost  of this therapy is substantially less
>than that of either  traditional cancer treatment or many other
>alternative cancer  therapies. The clinic is staffed by the most
>experienced and  successful BioResonance Tumor Therapists in the world.
>For more  information please see our web site at http://newhopeclinic.com
>or call the message line (562) 402-1356 and leave your name,  number and
>the best time to return your call or e-mail
>mailto: The web site contains  approximately 80
>pages of information detailing the laboratory  research and clinical case
>histories of numerous cancer patients  as well as contact information for
>the clinic.
>
>
>
>
>[ AUTOMATICALLY SKIPPING HTML ENCODING! ]
>------=_NextPart_000_006F_01BE205E.46D484E0
>Content-Type: text/html;
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>Message #10875
>From: "Ken Mayerine" <>
>Date: Sat, 5 Dec 1998 16:33:41 +0800
>Subject: The Death of Mark Howard Riegal (and the Gold Standard)
>
>Dear Fred:
>
>I'm interested in your article about my uncle Mark's recent death,
>and the lethality of scarcity economics and red tape.
>
>After thinking about your offer to use fictional names and aliases,
>I've decided that it would be more useful if you were to use the
>actual names.
>
>Please feel free to write your article using the actual names and
>events.
>
>You'll find, upon researching our family, that there is an
>off the shelf modern myth in the making.
>
>My grandfather, Norbert H. Riegel, is a retired Air Force Colonel.
>He was once a minuteman missile launch site commander, and before
>that, a World War II B-17 bomber pilot.
>
>He wrote a book, called "Papa Pete", that chronicles his life story.
>There are interesting tidbits in this book, including a letter from
>the Pope of the Roman Catholic Church, honoring him for his services.
>
>Mark was a recording artists who never had the money to promote his
>work.  He made a tape, called "Mark Riegel: Live in Lompoc", in which
>he lyricized his frustration with property taxes, economic injustice,
>and establishment idiocy such as licensing requirements for people
>who want to camp peacefully at national parks and forests.
>
>Maybe we could get Mark's music online, and listen to it while
>celebrating the death of William Gates II, and William Gates III?  I
>never thought I'd want to be a cannibal, but in the context of
>celebrating my Uncle's adherence to his principles, a little roast
>down in Silicon Valley over the demise of monopolistic practices
>sounds very tempting.
>
>I don't think Mark died entirely of natural causes.  I think Perry
>Towles shot a hole the size of a golf ball in his oversized heart,
>for the pupose of getting a discussion started about whether or not
>Teledesic would be the kind of gun we'd want in the hands of a robber
>baron, like Bill Gates.
>
>What is the possibility that his wife was one of those "Whoops,
>accidental bun in the oven, better get married" killer shop droids
>("stick on a stump on a stem"), sent in for a close range kill?  A
>Blade Runner style, Rachael series.  Sweet, Warm, and Loving, till
>she reads the words "cull the calf".  All genetic blank shop killer
>for hire programming.  I think she's probably backed up seven ways
>from Sunday on QDCM, so even if Perry turned her into a pile
>of sawdust shortly after she blew her kids head off in a coked up
>mania over her husbands A.W.O.L., she could be returned in time to
>do the paperwork for Larry.  Splice the genes with some fast growth
>tissue, spin up another blank in a jello tank, and she'll be back to
>save the day.
>
>I know Bill didn't like my having the name "Immedia Expert Systems"
>back in the old days when I was working as a waiter at "Hawk's Cay".
>That must be why he had Adnan Kashogi send his best hooker, James R.
>Wilkenson (former Marboro Man), to blow my mind, shoot me up with
>Ketamine, and convince me to go to the barefoot hippie dentist to get
>my silver fillings out, and replaced with C4 epoxy resin.
>
>Should we get this Tom Clancy story started now, or what?
>
>P.S. Thanks to Gail and Dan for eating Bill for dinner.
>
>-------------------
>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>End of CryoNet Digest
>*********************
>
>

Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=10881