X-Message-Number: 112 From att!uunet!mcvax!freja.diku.dk!stodol Wed Jul 5 14:40:53 1989 Received: from mcvax.UUCP by uunet.uu.net (5.61/1.14) with UUCP id AA05637; Wed, 5 Jul 89 14:40:53 -0400 Received: by mcvax.cwi.nl with SMTP; Wed, 5 Jul 89 20:38:20 +0200 (MET) Received: by freja.diku.dk (5.61++/IDA-1.2.8) id AA29099; Wed, 5 Jul 89 20:36:36 +0200 Date: Wed, 5 Jul 89 20:36:36 +0200 From: David Stodolsky <uunet!mcvax!diku.dk!stodol> Message-Id: <> To: ho4cad!kqb Return-receipt-to: @uunet.uu.net: [In msg #111] Thomas Donaldson <> said: > Now cryonics societies of course can enter into contracts, etc. If and > when cryonics becomes "respectable" a cryonics society could enter into > arrangements (just like a bank) to protect itself from > financial failure. Such arrangements are only for the future now. "Respectable", that's the word. When a cryonics society is not respectable enough to enter into arrangements to protect itself from financial failure, then it will not likely get customers. My idea is to get a respectable insurance company to have a vested interest in seeing suspended persons reanimated. My impression is that this would be a contract between the insurance company and the cryonics society. If the suspended person were destroyed, the insurance company would stop paying support fees and keep the capital. If they pushed and had people reanimated too soon, then the rehabilitation expense would eat up the capital. If the person was kept suspended unnecessarily long, maybe the insurance company would sue the cryonics society. Assume there are thousands of suspended persons, and each is backed by a capital of $100,000 that cannot be released until reanimation. This could get somebody in the insurance company to think that supporting cryonics research was quite a profitable idea. David S. Stodolsky, PhD Routing: <@uunet.uu.net:> Department of Psychology Internet: <> Copenhagen Univ., Njalsg. 88 Voice + 45 31 58 48 86 DK-2300 Copenhagen S, Denmark Fax. + 45 31 54 32 11 Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=112