X-Message-Number: 11264 From: Thomas Donaldson <> Subject: Is it really digitality, or do multiplicities suffice? Date: Sat, 13 Feb 1999 23:28:30 +1100 (EST) Hi again! For Mike Perry, I will point out that the major factor in his ideas seems to be not the digital nature of human beings but instead the possibility of multiple universes. Even if we are NOT digital that does not mean that with multiple universes we might not be repeated: the number of universes itself need not be limited to countable. With an uncountable set of other universes (uncountable in the math sense, just as the real numbers are uncountable) then there is no difficulty with repetition of someone who can only be described using real numbers rather than (ultimately) integers (as a digital person would be). If I understand the original ideas behind the notion of multiple universes, there is nothing in quantum theory preventing them from being uncountable (again, in the mathematical sense). Moreover, even the presence of multiple universes does not imply anything about whether or not those universes may be characterized by rational numbers --- as the notion of characterizing them DIGITALLY seems to imply. So far as I can see, the two ideas bear no relationship to one another. For that matter, it is an assumption (perhaps or perhaps not well founded from what we now know) that these multiple universes will produce copies of us. Yes, if every quantum event produced another universe, then we'd expect copies of ourselves in every one. But then we can have multiple universes produced only by an infinite subset of possible quantum events, none of which are involved in our lives (I am exploring the basic ideas here, not the original explanation of quantum theory). As for myself, I have sometimes looked back at various points in my life in which, with hindsight, I could see that I had survived some fatal event. Becoming a cryonicist may turn out to be one of those points. Is it that my awareness, terminated in all those universes in which I did NOT escape that fatal event, continuing in universes in which I do? I presently see no way at all to establish such an idea experimentally. Even the multiple universes constantly hiving off to explain quantum phenomena have one difficult feature: no way exists to move from one to the other. If there were, quantum theory itself would suffer some major changes. For now there simply seems no way we might pass between or even contact these other universes; in essence, then, they do not exist. That is why I do not feel personally interested in unreachable versions of myself which may survive when I do not. Best and long long life to all, Thomas Donaldson Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=11264