X-Message-Number: 113 From att!uunet!mcvax!freja.diku.dk!stodol Wed Jul 5 14:40:56 1989 Received: from mcvax.UUCP by uunet.uu.net (5.61/1.14) with UUCP id AA05644; Wed, 5 Jul 89 14:40:56 -0400 Received: by mcvax.cwi.nl with SMTP; Wed, 5 Jul 89 20:38:47 +0200 (MET) Received: by freja.diku.dk (5.61++/IDA-1.2.8) id AA29104; Wed, 5 Jul 89 20:36:55 +0200 Date: Wed, 5 Jul 89 20:36:55 +0200 From: David Stodolsky <uunet!mcvax!diku.dk!stodol> Message-Id: <> To: ho4cad!kqb Subject: CRYONICS - Re: risk analysis (and AIDS) A modest proposal? Another way to rationalize risk is by direct economic analysis. Current expenses associated with cryonic suspension are in the range of $100,000. The "life time" medical expenses associated with each AIDS case are in the same range. Prognosis with AIDS is not good, and quality of life usually leaves something to be desired. One of the earliest indications of AIDS is pneumonia as a result of opportunistic infection. Untreated this rapidly leads to death with other organs, particularly the brain, in relatively good condition. Theses deaths are highly predictable making such patients excellent cryonic suspension candidates. Odds are that an effective treatment or cure for AIDS is only 10 or 20 years in the future, maybe this permits a less heroic (non-freezing) suspension protocol. Given a rational system of health care (to pay the bills - I doubt insurance is an option, but this could be investigated) there would be no shortage of customers (allowing economies of scale that could also benefit noninfected cryo patients). What is the lowest expense to provide this more limited suspension arrangement on a large scale? Who can prepare a proposal that can be sent to appropriate People With AIDS (PWA) activist organizations? David S. Stodolsky, PhD Routing: <@uunet.uu.net:> Department of Psychology Internet: <> Copenhagen Univ., Njalsg. 88 Voice + 45 31 58 48 86 DK-2300 Copenhagen S, Denmark Fax. + 45 31 54 32 11 Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=113