X-Message-Number: 12328 From: Date: Wed, 25 Aug 1999 13:13:53 EDT Subject: C, predictions George Smith mentioned Linus Pauling's long-time advocacy of megadoses of vitamin C (as a prophylactic for colds and other ailments including some cancers) and the failure of others to test his recommendations. This is my clear impression also. I have seen many studies purporting to cast doubt on the efficacy of vitamin C for colds (as well as many tending to support it), but not one study that used the amounts recommended by Pauling. If anyone can provide more comprehensive and detailed information on this, it would be helpful. I should also reiterate two other points often forgotten in evaluating C for colds: One is that people vary, and what works consistently for some will not necessarily work for everyone. The second point, from my own experience, is that C works well to prevent (or perhaps suppress) colds only if I hit the incipient cold (or flu) very hard at the first intimation of symptoms, that first intimation often being just a slight but definite feeling that I know from experience. I take at least two grams at once, then a gram every hour for about 4 hours. Works for me, every time. But if a researcher were to try to do a statistical study on this approach, it would be very difficult. How could he evaluate or quantify the symptoms and the responses of the subjects? Mr. Smith also mentioned statistics showing that "experts" are typically wrong in prognostications. I have a clear recollection of the thrust of a report many years ago by George Gallup, showing that--beyond the near future--laymen did better in broad predictions than the experts in their own fields. (Forest-and-trees phenomenon, no doubt; the layment just looked at the sweep of history, while the experts were hung up on the apparent near-term problems.) However, I have lost the actual citation; it would be helpful if someone could supply it. Robert Ettinger Cryonics Institute Immortalist Society http://www.cryonics.org Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=12328