X-Message-Number: 12893
Date: Thu, 02 Dec 1999 17:54:49 -0500
From: david pizer <>
Subject: Re: Robert Ettinger's comments

Robert Ettinger raises some interesting points.  Here is my response.

Dave Pizer
---------------

>Message #12884
>From: 
>Date: Tue, 30 Nov 1999 21:13:45 EST
>Subject: "Cryonics-supportive community"
>
>To Dave & Trudy Pizer, and anyone interested in a Venturist 
>"cryonics-supportive community"-
>
>Dave's recently reiterated proposal certainly has some appeal. For example, 
>it has drawn the attention of a long-lapsed member of the Cryonics Society
of 
>Michigan (now the Immortalist Society). But there are many obvious questions 
>which need to be examined:
>
>One class of prospective occupants would be retired cryonicists (i.e., not 
>working for a living) already in the Phoenix area. The only ones I can think 
>of offhand are Mae and myself, and we would not like to give up our home for 
>an apartment. Conceivably, I suppose, we could take two adjoining apartments 
>to give us enough space.

There are some other cryoncists that do not work that live in the area.  I
only know of about half a dozen.  Still this is a small group, I agree.
Let's look at the other groups.

> We would still have to give up our current very good 
>location, which is within a three minute drive of either our hospital or our 
>trained morticians.

This is one important consideration.  I would agree that the place we
choose should be near a good hospital.  The facility will also need to be
near shopping, recreation and other amenities.  Most of the residents (I
assume) will come there to live, and only a small number will come there to
die and be frozen.

>Another class might be working cryonicists living in the Phoenix area. Aside 
>from Alcor employees, I don't know how many there are, and my impression is 
>that Alcor employees don't have a lot of money to invest. In the case of 
>people like Dave and Trudy, I suspect that they too would not like to give
up 
>their home for an apartment. 

That is a good point.  The best solution seems to be a large piece of land
that could support dozens of apartments and dozens of houses.  Some people
will want a large house some others might want or only be able to afford a
small apartment - if we can please everyone we can be more successful.
Aside from the living buildings (houses, apartments, condos,) there could
be a common swimming-pool area, spa, tennis courts, volley ball, putting
green, gym, and a club house where anyone from a small apartment or big
house (or if there also was a motel on the property) could go to and eat a
meal, have meetings, have speakers come in, or otherwise interact with
other cryoncists and make friends.

>A third class might be retired cryonicists outside of the Phoenix area but 
>willing to move here. Again, I don't know how many there are, or whether
they 
>would be willing to move into the type of apartment proposed.

This is the largest class of prospects.  Having options from small
apartments to medium and large size houses would allow the facility to
attract the largest number of residents.

>If you are thinking of raising money from cryonicists who have no firm plans 
>to move in soon, if ever, but still might give financial support, that seems 
>like a weak reed. Stalwarts like Thomas Donaldson will give something to 
>almost any worthy cryonics-related cause, but how much it might total is 
>doubtful.
>
>The nub of the rub seems to lie in the fact that, in most cases, those able 
>to invest are unlikely to want to move in before "need." Joe Cannon could 
>have moved from Florida to Phoenix at any time, before he deteriorated, and 
>he knew that would improve his chances. But the same inertia and paralysis, 
>more or less, that keeps so many out of cryonics in the first place, also 
>prevents many of those in cryonics from doing all they might to improve
their 
>chances. The path of least resistance is the road to oblivion.
>
>Of course you (Dave) have intimated that the project could be, in the 
>beginning or in part, just an ordinary apartment project, but owned or 
>controlled by cryonicists with a view to eventually having mostly
cryonicists 
>as tenants or share-owners.

It seems to me the best way to finance this facility would be to buy a 40
acre parcel on the north edge of Scottsdale now (The best land for the
money) and let the city grow to and around the parcel.  I estimate it will
take 5 to 10 years.  In the meantime, anyone living there would not be 3
minutes from a hosptal but maybe 15 minutes from Mayo Hospital, (Not the
Mayo Clinic n east Scottsdale but the new Mayo Hospital near the north
border of Scottsdale) one of the best in the world.

And in some cases (I realize not in Robert Ettinger's, but for others that
live in some parts of the city) even though they live closer in miles to a
hospital the drive time (at certain times of the day) might be more than 15
minutes.

A 40 acre parcel on the  north edge of town (Scottsdale) would cost about 1
million dollars today.  A similar 40 acre parcel in the middle of town
today costs about 5 million dollars to ten million dollars.  So those
people who were the initial investors could expect their investment to
appreciate, ALTHOUGH I CAN NOT GUARANTEE IT - there is some risk in any
investment.

After the land is secured, the construction of, perhaps, six small
apartment units might begin.  If tenants could be found for these right
away that would be good, but if not, the units could be rented (similar to
motel rooms) to cryonics visitors from time to time, and eventually
full-time tenants could be found.

When a person wanted a house (rather than an apartment) they could enter
into a 99 year ground lease for a part of the 40 acres (a quarter to a half
acre is a nice size lot) and then they could build their own house as large
or small as they like, put a wall around it if the liked

When the first six apartments eventually became filled with full-time
residents, then a second phase could begin with 6 more.  Or perhaps phase
two would be for 12 units. Then phase three and so on.

The 40 acre site is large enough for dozens of homes and/or apartments or
condos.  After there were a certain amount of full-time residents living
there, the common amenities could be built and each resident would pay a
small fee for their use.  That's when we would build the pool, gym, etc.

> In that case, money could be raised from any real 
>estate investor, as well as cryonicists.

This could be funded by people making tax-deductable donations to the
Venturists AND people investing directly into the project.  When Alcor
wanted to have a nice facility in Scottsdale, that's what Steve, I and
other Alcor members did.  We formed an LLC and Alcor owns a part of it, and
members also own part of it.  As one of the investors, I have seen the
value of my investment rise.

We could form an LLC to own the land and the Venturists could own a part
this LLC (depends on how much they could raise in donations) and
individuals could own a part.   The Venturists could eventually operate an
assisted living facility in part of the overall community.  Although the
majority of the facility would be owned by the investors.  They would want
to make a return on their investment, see the investment grow in value, and
create a nice place for themselves to live now or perhaps retire to someday.

> It might be more attractive than 
>average, with more stable and responsible occupants, and perhaps lower 
>overhead owing to some volunteer caretaking. I believe you have also 
>intimated--and demonstrated in the past--that you are willing to give your 
>own time and expertise in planning and negotiation and management. 


>The burden should not fall only on you, but the leadership will. As you
know, 
>the only way to get these things off the ground is to make your plans and 
>then launch them--make it a fact rather than a mere potential. That didn't 
>work last time, to be sure, but maybe it would now.

If I had informal commitments for enough supporters to purchase the initial
land assuming the whole project met with their approval before they were
fully committed, I would start the work to form a committee to investigate
moving on with this.  If I had informal committments from even a few
potential larger investors or contributors (say an initial, total amount of
4 or 5 hundred thousand dollars, (say 5 people who would each want to
invest $100,000 or more) I think I could raise the rest.

>Anyway, if the Venturists launch a venture, Mae and I will support it, 
>although we won't at this time pledge a specific dollar amount.

Thank you.

Dave Pizer

>Robert Ettinger
>Cryonics Institute
>Immortalist Society
>http://www.cryonics.

Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=12893