X-Message-Number: 13109
From:  (JOHN KRUG)
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2000 13:04:08 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Non EMS Cryonics

  Re: #13104.
   My opinion hasn't changed.  The tone of the
suggestions contained in #13086 can be construed as the arbitrary and
compulsory use of perfected cryostasis against certain groups of people
who may have characteristics that are "undesirable" to the author.
Who's to make such judgments?   Seeking "final solutions" has
already been done.   I think such lines of thinking are destructive and
should be avoided
in order that positive growth of perfected cryostasis as an option can
be realized.
   Best Regards!   John B. Krug

Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=13109