X-Message-Number: 13892 From: Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2000 18:28:56 EDT Subject: nitrogen etc I'm tickled to note James Swayze's latest burst of inventiveness, in re the nitrogen refrigeration problem. And it gives one pause to realize that someone with his terrible health problems can in so many ways outdo most of us. As to the merits of his suggestions, that remains to be seen, although I will have a few preliminary words here. I haven't yet had a chance to get costs of the Cryomech equipment mentioned, which is a crucial factor. From a more general standpoint, as previously mentioned, whenever anyone has investigated the cost of LN2 generating equipment and the cost of running it, it has been MUCH more expensive than the cost of buying the product, on our current and near-future scale of operation. The cost of electrical energy alone, for us to make it, has always been higher than the cost of buying it. In an idealized future, as suggested by myself and others many years ago, we could use (say) thermopiles as the energy source, with no moving parts and therefore negligible maintenance, utilizing temperature differences between ground layers or between ground and air (Peltier effect, reverse of the thermocouple or Thomson effect). But capital costs so far are out of sight. Solar and wind, as Mr. Swayze says, are also possibilities, but also not competitive so far. Whether Mr. Swayze's detailed suggestions for a closed circuit system would work economically and reliably, I don't know. Conventional wisdom would say probably not, because after all he is talking basically about just plain refrigeration, a well known problem and well known commercial opportunity, with plenty of people always worrying at it. At the same time, advances in well known and conventional areas do happen now and then. I can't honestly see this area as one of prime importance to cryonics, but when I get a chance I'll try to check out some of the numbers once more and report. Robert Ettinger Cryonics Institute Immortalist Society http://www.cryonics.org Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=13892