X-Message-Number: 14128 From: Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2000 11:34:51 EDT Subject: continuity, distinguishability etc Scott Badger suggests our sense of continuity may be the main feature or criterion of survival. Of course one old problem, in addition to others he notes, is that any "sense" (other than qualia) may be an illusion. Arthur Clarke reportedly said he turned down cryonics because "We are different people every 10 years or so anyway." Obviously, the sense of "sufficient" continuity varies widely with individuals. If we "survive," then in the remote future we will probably have scarcely anything in common with our present selves. But if the self circuit is time-binding, then your present self spans a non-zero time interval (and if time is quantized, more than one chronon). Thus the "selves" in your continuer sequence overlap, and there is logic (as well as instinct) in your concern for your future selves. Your concern, of course, will be most intense for those future selves closest to you in time, other things equal--but concern also depends on the nature or quality of the goals involved, so you could still have substantial interest in broad-brush goals for the far future. ------------- Mike Perry--and many scientists, prominently including Frank Tipler--believe that "indistinguishable" systems are identical in every meaningful way. In the least controversial case, they point out, two atoms of the same kind, in the same quantum state, are indistinguishable, even in principle, hence must not have separate identities. Again I take issue with this. "Same quantum state" can be a tricky and misleading label. If (say) two atoms are widely separated in space, then they ARE distinguishable both in principle and in practice. (Look at a track in a cloud chamber.) (In addition, of course, a FULL designation of "quantum state" for any system is beyond our current knowledge, and might even have to account for the complete history of the cosmos, if interacting systems remain entangled.) Robert Ettinger Cryonics Institute Immortalist Society http://www.cryonics.org Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=14128