X-Message-Number: 14882 From: Subject: identity Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2000 10:51:05 -0800 (PST) The latest spate of discussion on uploading, teleporting, and duplicating does illustrate at least two things: One, a fish isn't aware of water, and two, the danger of the "smuggled concept." One of the hazards of growing up in the information age is that we can start to think of these things as "real." It gets beaten into our heads at a very early age that "=", "equal" and "identical" means that things are interchangeable. 1 + 1 = 2 means that *everywhere* you have a "2" you can replace it with a "1 + 1" and *nothing* changes. There are *no* places where this doesn't work - they're the SAME thing. Well, that's all fine and dandy but let's try to remember that "1", "2", "+" and "=" are all ABSTRACTS. If we take a second and just look at the real world (our minds free of abstracts), one of the things we might notice is that there's really only ONE of everything. There's really not two of anything in the universe - that's what "identity" is all about. Now, granted there are an awful lot of very similar things - but all that means is that (at most) they might have identical descriptions. Descriptions are abstract things. Two electrons are not "identical" in the same sense as 1 + 1 and 2 are identical. And I'm not talking about quantum states here - this is more fundamental: this has to do with the fact that there are two of them and one is not the other. If somehow you could obliterate one of them (not just change its form), the universe would be down one electron. Crossing the line between the abstract and the real is where the concept of "identical" has to be left behind. Several points with regard to teleportation: First, obviously and as an aside, this isn't something we're going to have to worry about any time soon, if ever. Picking up an object and carrying it from A to B is actually a tremendously parallel process with a bandwidth not easily matched. Second, sending (or recording, or duplicating) the description of an object has moved nothing. A description of an object is an abstract. (I'm not talking about whatever media is used to represent the description.) Using the description of an object as a recipe still doesn't move anything - it (at most) creates another object or set of objects and relationships that have the same (more likely similar) description. Now, it's been mentioned that we old-fashioned folks will just "get used" to teleportation once it's been around for a while and proven to be "safe." For many I have little doubt that this would be true (granting the assumption of teleportation): we're witnessing it right here with a generation that grew up on Star Trek. I'm sure that everyone around, including the person who came out of it, will agree that nothing has changed, and "Hey, what was I worried about?!" I do find it significant that the one person we can't check with is the one who went *into* the teleporter. In many ways this seems so much like the situation we cryonicists are faced with now: everybody is so damned used to the idea that their soul just floats off to "another plane." What's kinda surprising about all this is that there're so many cryonicists at the head of the teleporter line saying "Me first, me first." One final frustrating point: occasionally someone here will accuse someone who hasn't accepted the new "information paradigm" as being someone who thinks there's something mystical or magic going on in a human being. I don't know about the rest of them, but I'm about as concrete-bound as you can get. To me it seems like you've taken this abstract thing, information, given it all the attributes of what used to be called a "soul" and given it a new, flashy package. What's the difference? There is no soul. There is no pattern. There isn't even a mind. What there is is a brain and another one "just like it" isn't it. This goes for bricks just as much as it goes for brains. [None of this is meant to have anything to do with the piecemeal replacement of a brain - which is different in kind from "pattern is everything."] Eric Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=14882