X-Message-Number: 1492 Date: 23 Dec 92 00:35:11 EST From: Charles Platt <> Subject: CRYONICS To: Kevin Brown Not for distribution to sci.cryonics. Kevin Brown has suggested that I should post an announcement and some background information about the cryonics contest in the January 1993 Omni magazine. Here goes. Almost a year ago, I suggested to Keith Ferrell, Omni's editor, that he could publish and publicize a contest in which people would be asked to write a short essay on the subject, "What I would most like to see and do in the 22nd century." The best essay would win a whole-body cryonic suspension for the person who wrote it. The contest would create several benefits, for Alcor and for Omni: 1. Publicity. Omni has an excellent PR department, as I know from experience. Nothing like the contest has ever been done before, so it should be newsworthy. 2. Names and addresses of potential members, whom Alcor can contact. Obviously, anyone who enters the contest is seriously interested in cryonics. 3. A chance to improve the image of cryonics. By offering a suspension as a prize, it seems more valuable, less like a grim fate. 4. A chance (maybe the first ever) for Alcor to control the media actively, rather than wait passively for journalists to do whatever they want. 5. Omni would get to publish the winning essay, giving them free material and cryonics yet another mention. Keith Ferrell liked the idea. Alcor's board of directors approved it. There was then a long, long wait. Every few weeks, I called Keith and asked if he was still serious about the contest. He always said he was. He even asked me to write an introduction to preface the contest, explaining cryonics. This I did (with Alcor's approval). More time passed. I made more calls. I got paid for writing my introduction, but the contest was still not scheduled. Keith is a busy man, and there was always something more pressing. Finally, just before I went away to Australia for three weeks, I received word that the contest was being scheduled, and it was now a rush job. By this time, six months had passed since I'd written my original cryo-intro. I had learned more about cryonics, and I regretted that I hadn't done a better job on the text. I asked to do a rewrite. Alas, I learned that my previous version had been typeset, so there wasn't much room for revision. But I did improve the piece a little. (I'm still not entirely happy with it.) Meanwhile, negotiations were in progress between Ralph Whelan at Alcor and Keith Ferrell at Omni. I had no part in this, because although the contest had been my personal project, I was not asked to represent Alcor, since I am merely a member, not an employee or a director. Nor was I consulted about any subsequent developments (such as changing the essay topic and reducing the length from 500 to 250 words, which I think Omni chose to do). But Ralph did an excellent job of negotiating terms, and I doubt that I could have done as well. The January issue of Omni has now been mailed to subscribers, and it should be on the stands soon. Looking at that issue is a strange experience, since it presents cryonics in a way that no mass-market magazine has ever presented it before: as a normal, acceptable, *desirable* idea. Omni had to present it that way, because they were offering cryonics as a prize! I hope the lesson here is clear. Unfortunately, in my opinion, the photographs that appear with the article are not very edifying. I understand that some time ago, a photographer spent three days taking pictures at Alcor for a feature in Longevity magazine. Evidently he received a lot of cooperation--more than was wise, in my opinion. A (simulated?) body with bare feet sticking out from under a black sheet in an operating room lit to look like a dim crypt, with monitoring equipment under red lighting, as if it's a tool of Satan...! But what puzzles me as a mere cryo-consumer is that Alcor seems to have asked Omni to use these pictures. As I understand it, Omni did not realize that its sister magazine, Longevity, still had the photos lying around unused. I'm puzzled because here was an opportunity for Alcor to call the shots. Surely, among Alcor's members there must be a photographer who would have been delighted to take pictures of the lab the way WE like to see it. And let me tell you, Omni's rate of payment for photographs is sufficiently generous, the photographer could have flown across the country, if necessary, without complaining too much about the cost of the plane ticket. I try to maintain a double perspective on cryonics, as an outsider as well as an insider, because I think this makes it easier for me to write about cryonics for outsiders. When I apply my outsider's perspective, I see that cryonicists are very tough and very savvy about laws and justice. They win great victories in situations where the rules are clearly stated. But cryonicists can also be very naive in ad-hoc practical matters, especially where "image" and PR are concerned. This is commendable in that it means cryonicists present their case honestly. And yet, I feel sad to see photographs that shout "Death, death, death!" where the opposite message would have been so much more desirable. I am also unhappy that the magazine page describing the contest was written by someone at Omni who did not (so far as I know) get the choice of words okayed by Alcor. Consequently "death" recurs here, several times. Once again, Alcor could have controlled this. I would like to see an Alcorian actually given the job of handling PR, if any member has the qualifications and the time. Needless to say, I would volunteer myself, but I have no training whatsoever. I've promoted my own books on TV and radio, but that's about it. I'm still amazed that I was able to interest Omni in the contest in the first place. I'd never done anything like this before. Naturally, I hope the contest attracts a lot of entries, so we get a lot of new names of potential members. Otherwise, one of the main purposes of the contest will be unfulfilled, and I will feel that my idea was a wasteful failure. Meanwhile, I am very interested in hearing people's opinions on this subject and on PR in general. --Charles Platt Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=1492