X-Message-Number: 1514 Date: 26 Dec 92 02:34:56 EST From: "Steven B. Harris" <> Subject: CRYONICS Moral Dilemma #2 <continued from last message> <Sigh>. Of course, we are all pretty much *in* this situa- tion, are we not? We now live in a Rome which is persecuting its Christians, and when in Rome, the question is whether or not to do as the Romans do, if only for the sake of our lives. The analogies I used here so far are quite appropriate, I think, for we (like many people living at many times in history) find ourselves living in a fundamentally insane society. Here is the "Land of the Free" we observe that we have a larger fraction of our population incarcerated than any other country on the face of the Earth where they keep records. We have more people im- prisoned per capita in the U.S. *by far* than the nearest runners-up, which are those loving societies which run South Africa and what was once the USSR. In the U.S., fully one quarter of our young black men are in prison, on parole, or under indictment for a felony, and the number is increasing. We have just elected a president whose solution to the growing numbers of people imprisoned this way is to build "camps" for them. No word yet on whether they will be taught there to pick cotton. It will not have escaped your notice that the largest numbers of our citizens in the U.S. are in jail for exactly the same kind of thing that nailed Steve Rudell, and the system of infringement of civil rights which has grown and grown in response to the "war on drugs" (read: the war on the underclass) is exactly the system which was successfully used to smear Alcor in that wonderfully MacCarthyistic guilt-by-association ploy that Keith has detailed for us. One can make, as I have said, therefore, a very good pragmatic argument that we at Alcor should do as much as we can in the future to distance ourselves as much as we can from anyone who breaks the law, commits civil disobedience, or even annoys the government in any way. Yes, our lives may depend on it. I can only report, however, that to me it feels like cowardice, and I am, under this degree of threat, at least, unwilling to do it. One of my favorite stories is about Henry David Thoreau, who was thrown into jail once because he refused to pay taxes which he believed would be spent on what he considered an unjust war with Mexico. In the story, Thoreau's friend Ralph Waldo Emerson eventually shows up at the jail, and says: "Henry! What are you doing in there?" To which Thoreau replies, "What are YOU doing out THERE?" In an unjust society it may well be (as Thoreau tells us) that the proper place for the just man is in jail. Or if not in jail, at least out of power, mired in legal battles, and having a hell of a time. The problem, of course, is what to do about those who depend on you while you fight and suffer. Henry David Thoreau had no wife and children, and thus had not given (so the saying goes) hostages to fortune. In cryonics, our hostages to fortune are the suspended patients, who trust in us not to destroy them while playing at some (perhaps foolish) bit of defiance of the system. I said it was an ethical dilemma, remember? Each of you reading this must wrestle with the same question for yourselves, and come to some solution that will give you peace. Now you know my present thinking. Personally, there are times when I feel that if we don't do something about the slide toward totali- tarianism in this country, I don't give a fig whether I'm ever brought back at all. In fact, I'd probably prefer not. You may feel differently. Some of the patients may feel differently. Merry Christmas. Steve Harris Distribution: >INTERNET: Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=1514