X-Message-Number: 15342
From: "John de Rivaz" <>
References: <>
Subject: Re: legal expenses offer
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2001 11:21:55 -0000

In fact, as the two attached excerpts from cryonet show, the two sides to
this debate seem reasonably close. However I am not sure of the legal
ramifications of "attempting to join" rather than "being expelled".

Despite having (theoretically unlimited) costs being offered, there is the
question of loss of time and stress such a case may bring, and this would
undoubtedly result is less research being done. There is a balance to be
drawn between the loss of research and advantages of defeating the attitude
currently held by those imposing their views of life and death over the
Society for Cryobiology.

--
Sincerely, John de Rivaz
my homepage links to Longevity Report, Fractal Report, music, Inventors'
report, an autobio and various other projects:
http://www.geocities.com/longevityrpt
http://www.autopsychoice.com - should you be able to chose autopsy?

>
> Message #15341
> Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2001 23:35:20 -0500
> From: Paul Antonik Wakfer <>
> Subject: Ettinger's Mischievous Associational Remarks - CryoNet #15333
> References: <>
<del>
> If Mr Ettinger and CI are willing to provide for legal expenses, I
> expect it would not be hard to find a cryonicist who would be willing to
> attempt to join the Society for Cryobiology while openly and blatantly
> espousing cryonics.
<del>

> Message #15200
> From: 
> Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2000 12:54:47 EST
> Subject: media, SfC etc
>
<del>
> In might in fact be a heaven-sent opportunity if the Society did expel
> someone, already recognized in cryobiology through publication in a
> recognized journal, perhaps including Cryobiology, the journal of the
Society
> for Cryobiology--for a difference of scientific opinion!!! Such
scientists,
> with our financial backing, could file suit for damages and defamation,
> leading to public hearings with expert witnesses and sworn testimony and
> cross examination. How marvelous! They would finally be cornered!
>
> It might not be totally inappropriate to remind readers that one
organization
> we know spent years of extremely expensive litigation
> fighting--successfully!--certain illegal activities of the Food and Drug
> Adminstration. And the FDA was a MUCH more powerful, ruthless,
well-financed,
> and generally formidable foe than the SfC would be.
>
> Of course, we know that individuals may have employers or family who are
so
> hostile or so fearful that a personal risk of some sort might really be
> involved, and we cannot demand personal sacrifices. But my feeling is
that,
> in many cases, the risk is more perceived than real.
>
> Robert Ettinger
> Cryonics Institute
> Immortalist Society
> http://www.cryonics.org

Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=15342