X-Message-Number: 15448
From: "Dani Kollin" <>
Subject: RE: CryoNet #15444 
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2001 15:47:23 +0200

Message #15444
From: "Mark Plus" <>
Subject: "The Very Radical Business of Long Life and Eternal Youth"
 Life and Eternal Youth

I find it simply amazing that an article as comprehensive as the once Mark
graced us with mentions nowhere the nanotechnology revolution and the
obvious impact it will have on the process of aging. Is this because the
beam of nano reseach has not been cast primarily on the prospects of aging
and the curing of disease or simply because the technology is in its early
infancy? But that won't really suffice as an answer because the article did
mention a number of other early stage (emerging) technologies. So again I
ask, how was nano left out?

Anyone want to take a gander?

Dani

Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=15448