X-Message-Number: 15448 From: "Dani Kollin" <> Subject: RE: CryoNet #15444 Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2001 15:47:23 +0200 Message #15444 From: "Mark Plus" <> Subject: "The Very Radical Business of Long Life and Eternal Youth" Life and Eternal Youth I find it simply amazing that an article as comprehensive as the once Mark graced us with mentions nowhere the nanotechnology revolution and the obvious impact it will have on the process of aging. Is this because the beam of nano reseach has not been cast primarily on the prospects of aging and the curing of disease or simply because the technology is in its early infancy? But that won't really suffice as an answer because the article did mention a number of other early stage (emerging) technologies. So again I ask, how was nano left out? Anyone want to take a gander? Dani Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=15448