X-Message-Number: 15521 From: "Jeff Grimes" <> Subject: Updated CI Page Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2001 18:41:59 +0000 I have revisited the CI web page, in particular the page that previously contained the untrue derogatory statements about competitors. The URL of this page is: http://www.cryonics.org/comparisons.html#emergency The most damaging statement has now been removed, but the text on the page is still contrived to create a very misleading impression. Now that I have learned more about this subject, I am slightly shocked by the sales tactics being used. The page is very long so I will only quote one piece: "Also, and more importantly, the cryoprotectants used in vitrification (and in freezing) are toxic, depending on concentration and rate and temperature of introduction." This is misleading for several reasons. 1. ALL cryoprotectants are toxic, aren't they? 2. The 75% solution glycerol used by CI is a vitrification solution, according to Douglas Skrecky here on CryoNet. 3. Therefore CI is making it sound as if its competitors are using more dangerous techniques, when in fact CI itself is using a solution that is more toxic than anyone else's. "Thus, vitrification kills cells: with older methods of vitrification it poisoned and injured them to the point of actually disintegrating cell membranes in some cases. Indeed, the damage done by vitrification has in the past been so immense and so much worse than conventional suspension treatments that, on balance, every last cryonics organization has throughout cryonics history, until very recently, opted for the less destructive option of conventional glycerol suspension and cooling and liquid nitrogen storage." The change here is the introduction of the term "older methods." But still the text suggests that vitrification is BAD BAD BAD. And I would say, if "older methods" are not being used any more, why mention them now? Presumably, to scare people. I can't say that this is very reassuring about CI. Why would an organization bend the truth so much, and try to scare people by creating a bad image of its competitors? Jeff Grimes. Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=15521