X-Message-Number: 15574
From: "George Smith" <>
References: <>
Subject: Logic, Paul and Dale Carnegie
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2001 07:01:36 -0800

Oh, one quick comment.

In Paul Wakfer's Message #15572 he wrote:

"Mr Smith seems to not see the logical difference between knowing *what*
can't happen and saying that some things (*which* things we don't know and
may never know) will remain forever impossible. It is the difference between
the following two statements:
 1. X is not possible.
 2. There exists an X such that X will never be possible.
 Note that the last statement does not logically require anyone to produce
such an X. 1. implies 2. but 2. does not imply 1."

Paul, my ever weakening grasp on reality dictates that I must admit the
truth.

Unlike yourself, I honestly DON'T KNOW and CAN'T PROVE what will always be
impossible when it comes to what the future may produce to restore human
beings to life.  Omniscience is definitely not in my current bag of skills.

Sorry you seem to believe otherwise in regard to your own opinions.

Hope you change your mind someday.

Best wishes,

George Smith

Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=15574