X-Message-Number: 15862
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 15:06:04 +1100
From: Damien Broderick <>
Subject: re: who will revive you?

Bob Ettinger writes:

>As for the "usefulness" to future society of revived patients, that is the 
>wrong question. People are ends, not means. 

I do believe this is the correct answer (bolstered by such practical
replies as `Hey, I *paid* for revival up front'). It's true that there are
plenty of places right now where people are being hacked to death for
apparently trivial motives. It's surely up to all of us who are alive to do
what we can to ensure that our own future societies are not that kind.

>But even in those terms, there is 
>no problem. What use is a newborn? A "reborn" will be "useful" sooner than a 
>newborn. 

Hmmm. Maybe not, if the world we are reborn into lacks the capacity to
rejig our ossified brain/mental structures. But that is fairly unlikely, I
suspect, because many kinds of salient changes hang together. Which leads
to...

>(I leave out of account the radical "singularity" scenarios.)

Aaargh! You can't, you can't! Well, you can--but you need to give a damned
impressive principled reason why the future *won't* go in the
Singularity/Spike direction, and go there pretty fast at that. My hunch is
that to get the technology required for revival from current rudimentary
forms of cryostasis, we'll need moderately advanced nanotech and very, very
good computation, probably at the AI or Super-AI level. Once those
desiderata are instantiated, we'll be heading almost vertically up the
Spike, and all bets are off, or moot. 

I'd like to see a rebuttal of this general case, if there is one.

Damien 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr Damien Broderick / Senior Fellow, Department of English and Cultural
Studies
	University of Melbourne,  Parkville 3052, AUSTRALIA
	@:  <>
	Unofficial biography/bibliography site:
	http://www.thespike.addr.com
Australian Business Number (ABN): 98 674 378 153
-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=15862