X-Message-Number: 16156 From: Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2001 20:18:47 EDT Subject: ISCHEMIA: AN INTRODUCTION, Part I GLOBAL ISCHEMIA: A COMPREHENSIVE INTRODUCTION, PART I By Mike Darwin, CEO Kryos, Inc. WHAT IS ISCHEMIA Ischemia is the pathologic interruption of the delivery of adequate blood flow to tissues. Unlike anoxia where only oxygen delivery is compromised, ischemia constitutes a complete disruption of the normal functions of blood flow: delivery of oxygen and nutrients and other molecules essential to cellular survival as well as the removal of harmful byproducts of metabolism. Ischemia can either be partial or complete, regional (as in stroke), or global as in cardiac arrest. BACKGROUND In order to understand the implications of ischemia in the human cryopreservation patient it is first desirable to understand ischemia in the context of contemporary medicine. Heart attack and stroke are likely to be the pathologies that most clinicians cite as the principal cause of ischemia. In fact, ischemia is the major underlying cause of most mortality and morbidity in the critical care setting (ICU and Emergency Department) in the Western world. Closed head injury, blunt force trauma, shock and sepsis all have ischemia as the fundamental underlying common pathway. All of these illnesses have their lessons to teach about the pathophysiology mechanisms of ischemia. However, for purposes of clarity and relevance I will focus on global ischemia secondary to cardiac arrest as a result of heart attack or exsanguinating trauma. Of most immediate relevance to the cryopreservation patient is ischemia secondary to sudden cardiac death (SCD) and the events which follow failed or morbid resuscitation. EPIDEMIOLOGY Each year in the United States there are 540,000 deaths from myocardial infarction (MI) [1] (with 350,000 of these deaths occurring before the patient reaches the hospital) as a result of a non-perfusing arrhythmia, principally ventricular fibrillation [2]. This mode of sudden cardiac death (SCD) is also responsible for the majority of the 190,000 in-hospital deaths from MI, which typically occur within the first 24 hours following admission. [3]. Especially tragic is that 50% of these deaths occur in persons ~50 years of age or less [4]. An estimated additional 20,000 incidents of SCD occur as a result of asphyxiation, drowning, electrocution, and genetic or developmental predisposition to lethal arrhythmias (Wolf-Parkinson's White Syndrome, congenital thickening of the intraventricular septum, and idiopathic arrhythmic disease) and other non-atherosclerosis causes. This later category of SCD typically occurs in individuals whose mean age is less than 25 [5]. At this time the principal treatments for SCD consist of initiation of manual, "bystander" cardiopulmonary resuscitation, so-called Basic Cardiac Life Support (BCLS) followed by "definitive" treatment of the arrhythmia beginning with defibrillation and the application of Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS) [6]. ACLS consists of the application of an algorithm of manual CPR, electrical defibrillation and pharmacologic therapy aimed at restoring a perfusing cardiac rhythm and adequate blood pressure and cardiac output to sustain life until definitive treatment of the underlying cause of the cardiac arrest can be achieved (e.g., coronary revascularization, implantation of an automatic defibrillator, or life-long anti-arrhythmic therapy) [6]. The time to survival without neurological deficit following cardiac arrest in the absence of BCLS declines rapidly following a sigmoid curve with survival without neurological deficit being ~95% following 1 minute of arrest time, and 0% following 9 minutes of arrest [7]. Put another way, 50% of patients will experience significant morbidity or death following 4 minutes of circulatory arrest. What is not shown in this table is that the effect of immediate bystander CPR on survival is negligible in most studies [8, 9], with the primary benefit being observed in patients who's time from the initiation of BCLS to successful cardiac resuscitation was greater than 8 minutes [10]. There is evidence in the literature that morbidity is improved with prompt bystander CPR [11] providing that EMS response is also rapid, although this remains controversial [10, 12]. A corollary of this is that the overall survival rate following SCD, with, or without, serious neurological morbidity ranges between 1% (New York City, NY) [13] to 17% (Seattle, WA) [14]. The mean survival (defined as survival to discharge from the hospital) in the United States as a whole is generally agreed to be at best 15% [15] with ~70% of these patients experiencing lasting neurological morbidity (ranging from "mild" cognitive impairment to total incapacitation in the Persistent Vegetative State (PVS) [16-18]. The primary cause of non-survival in patients experiencing SCD is failed cardiac or cerebral resuscitation. Arguably, it is failed cerebral resuscitation, since most underlying causes of refractory cardiac arrest could be treated by "bridging" supportive technologies such as emergency femoral-femoral cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) until myocardial revascularization and hemodynamic stabilization is achieved [19]. When this technology is applied to patients who are candidates for good neurological outcome, the survival rate is increased [20-22]. These technologies are not typically used on patients who are unsuccessfully resuscitated (restoration of adequate cardiac rhythm and perfusion) because of the justified perception that irreversible brain damage would have occurred during the prolonged period of cardiac arrest or CPR/ACLS [20]. Similarly, it is for this reason that most attempts to achieve cardiopulmonary resuscitation in-hospital in patients who are not hypothermic, or intoxicated with sedative drug are terminated following 15 minutes [23, 24]. It is noteworthy that both past and current ACLS protocols contain no drugs aimed at treating the primary cause of failed or morbid resuscitation from SCD: principally post-ischemia-reperfusion encephalopathy (Textbook of Advanced Cardiac Life Support, Second Edition, AHA,1996). Over the past 15 years a vast number of therapeutic interventions have shown great promise in animal models in the laboratory [25-28]. However, none of these has been successfully applied clinically despite numerous attempts [29, 30]. These reasons include: a) the inappropriateness of animal models being used to validate pharmacologic or other means of therapeutic intervention, b) failure to address the multifactorial nature of the pathophysiology of ischemia-reperfusion injury, and c) the inability to rapidly induce mild systemic hypothermia which, arguably, has been shown to be one of the most potent interventions in achieving improved outcome from prolonged periods of cardiac arrest and the resulting normothermic systemic and, particularly, cerebral ischemia. In 1994, Critical Care Research, Inc. (Critical Care Research, then called 21st Century Medicine) of Rancho Cucamonga, CA began a program of research to investigate the used of multimodal drug therapy combined with mild, post resuscitative hypothermia (33 C-34 C). By Early 1996 Critical Care Research was achieving routine recovery of dogs from ~17 minutes of normothermic ischemia with 75% overall long term survival (<3 months) with less than 75% detectable neurological deficit in survivors. These extraordinary results were achieved by a multimodal drug approach using a slightly modified version of Safar, et al.'s model of CPB with hemodilution and prompt institution of hypothermia to achieve initial restoration of circulation and oxygenation [31-33]. Neurobehavioral and histological evaluation of randomly selected survivors from this study demonstrated no detectable deficits in 75% of the surviving animals (exceptions were some neuronal loss in the cerebellum, which was not associated with any demonstrable long-term disability, or motor deficit). It is noteworthy that no other investigators have come close to demonstrating these kinds of survival times following whole body normothermic cardiac arrest in dogs with such low levels of neurological deficit. Mortality Secondary to Massive Exsanguinating Trauma Resulting Cardiac Arrest Before Tertiary Care Is Accessible Closely related in pathophysiology to prolonged normothermic ischemia secondary to SCD is cardiac arrest secondary to exsanguinating trauma. It is estimated that ~20,000 US civilians a year die as result of hemorrhage from abdominal and thoracic injuries [36], or from poly-trauma. In developing nations this problem is even more severe as a disproportionate amount of trauma occurs in rural settings remote from tertiary care facilities and with no helicopter or other airlift infrastructure available to shorten this interval. Similarly, approximately 90% of the battlefield casualties who fail to reach tertiary care facilities die from intractable hemorrhage during transport. The US military under the auspices of DARPA is currently funding a multimillion project to achieve ~30 minutes of battlefield "suspended animation" using chilled, drug containing crystalloid solutions, to solve this serious cause of war-related mortality [37]. Cardiac arrest secondary to exsanguinating trauma offers a unique opportunity for intervention in the pathophysiological cascade of normothermic cardiac arrest. Because blood loss and deterioration of the patient to the agonal state occur over a time course of minutes to an hour or longer, it is possible to begin administration of systemic and cerebroprotective drugs, inhibit the clotting cascade, and induce modest hypothermia via the infusion of large quantities of chilled volume-replacement solutions. Typically, 3-4 liters of crystalloid are administered for each liter of blood lost. In situations where exsanguination will result in cardiac arrest, such as fracture of the liver, rupture of the spleen, and laceration of major vascular structures, 60% to 70% of the patient's blood volume will have been replaced with crystalloid at a ratio of 3:1 prior to cardiac arrest. For a typical 70 kg adult this would represent a volume of ~10 liters, which, if administered chilled to 2 -4 C could be expected to reduce systemic (core) temperature by ~3 -4 C, thus providing additional ischemic protection, transport time, and time for surgical repair of the hemorrhagic lesion(s). The ability to administer large volumes of parenteral products of defined electrolyte composition, containing multiple drugs, cellular edema inhibiting polymers, and hemorheologic agents prior to the occurrence of the insult (systemic ischemia) offers the opportunity to prevent many of the foreseeable irreversible pathological events which occur during ischemia as a result of SCD. Many of the therapeutic drugs which have proven effective in Critical Care Research's pilot study of sudden cardiac arrest (prolonged systemic ischemia) are likely to be far more effective if administered prior to the insult, rather than after a prolonged period of ischemia. The ability to induce a maximally effective degree of post-resuscitation hypothermia during the insult period is yet another added advantage of this mode of cardiac arrest. Thus, prolonged ischemic insult from either SCD or hemorrhagic cardiac arrest are interrelated and lend themselves to integration into a single protocol for investigation. [References are available upon request] End Part I Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=16156