X-Message-Number: 1666 Date: 23 Jan 93 09:36:30 EST From: Garret Smyth <> Subject: CRYONICS Sound bite I said: >>In the end I went for the "It's not a question of why *I* want >>to live, its a question of why *you* don't" approach. Tim Freeman: >Whenever I hear arguments about where the burden of proof lies, the >only conclusion I draw is that nobody has any proof. If I understand >your argument right (demanding that the questioner defend his view >instead of advocating your own) it would not have persuaded me. I feel that you are mistaken in thinking there is "proof" for the answer to this. Someone who doesn't want to live is not easy to persuade. If I could do that I would be a world renowned psychologist \ philosopher \ religious leader. It wasn't meant to prove that I am right and the questioner wrong, it was meant to trigger off something in the minds of people watching who might be attuned to our way of thinking. I had about thirty seconds to explain what cryonics was, how much it cost, why I thought it would work and why I was doing it and wanted to live forever. I've tried whittering on about how wonderful life is and it does't even convince other cryonicists. Some bits of it just aren't nice (and I haven't even been to Rigel IV yet!) but I just know that I want to stay alive. So what would have persuaded you, and would you have put it in away that was memorable would have taken a few seconds to say? Are you signed up? If so what convinced you, if not why not? Garret Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=1666