X-Message-Number: 16679 From: "ramzy ramzy" <> Subject: Doors of the history Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 17:01:59 -0000 Hi, Trygve Bauge In the start, I do not look forward to cryonics for some buried person. Also, I do not look forward to cloning in case of failure of cryonics in the future. My email is a result of your desire to build other full service provider in Norway and your problem with buying of LN2 with cheap prices. I know that the cryogenic liquid is not everything in cryonics because there is other problem (a special protocol for cryoprotectants) for every provider. Take this question: 1- What is the scientific field for the person who determines this protocol? I predict this answer: cryobiology. Is it right for you or the other organizations in USA? If it is false, then what is the right answer? 2- Why is not there any cryonics service in U.K. although there are many cryonicists there? I noted that there is no common protocol for cryoprotectants in cryopreservation in the different American companies. Then, any European cryobiologist can suggest a new protocol and train the people without the need to the training in USA. The efficiency will be improved with the experience. Perhaps, the answer for my question: there is no person in UK who is cryobiologist and cryonicist in the same time, but I am not sure if my prediction for the answer is right or not? In the end, You can enter history of cryonics if you build other full service provider for cryonics outside USA, but I hope that you enter from the right door far from the Australian case. This leads to the third question: 3- Why did not you write (in CryoNet) about your desire to build other full service provider before the Australian case? Ramzy _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=16679