X-Message-Number: 16753
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 16:39:07 -0700
From: Olaf Henny <>
Subject: Vitamin C fair4us
References: <>

In Message #16746  fair4us <> wrote:
Subject: Mike Darwin & The Vitamin Controversy

>An interesting observation, in light of the Saul & Bill Vitamin Company's
>position, which is provided at the following:
>Ah, but Mike doesn't work for them anymore, right?
>Regardless, who is the poor lay person to believe ...

I d say *both*.  They are not contradictory.
Taken together they say:

For cancer and cardiovascular protection:
Vitamin C = good.
For ischemic protection:
Vitamin C = bad.


Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=16753