X-Message-Number: 16866
Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2001 02:51:21 -0400
From: "Kevin Q. Brown" <>
Subject: Poisoning the Well
"You get only one chance to make a good first impression."
First the bad news...
Cryonics has a poor public reputation not because most
people are stupid and benighted but because it is a
poor product. Freezing still causes enormous injury
and its only saving grace is that the alternatives,
burial and cremation, are so much worse. We cannot
guarantee that a cryopreserved person never will be
revived, but we can guarantee that a buried or cremated
person never will.
Now the worse news...
In the absence of a good product (human cryopreservation),
any positive regard for our efforts requires that we
demonstrate a viable program toward improving and perfecting it.
But recent exchanges on CryoNet illustrate how to destroy
the opportunity for any good will that could arise from such
efforts. Normally I don't pick on any single poster,
but in this case we have such a ready-made example that I
cannot resist. As the "Typical Reader Response" below shows,
starting with a poor choice of messages "poisons the well";
any positive merit in subsequent messages is irrelevant as
the reader already has written off the writer. Similarly,
the more cryonics is associated with nutcase / kook / flake /
goofball cases, the harder it will be for the _good_ work
to be appreciated.
Kevin Q. Brown
--
CryoNet Msg Typical Reader Response
T.B. msg #1: On, No! He's at it again! Another rotting
corpse to rescue.
T.B. msg #2: Anyone who writes entirely in UPPER CASE
is seriously warped. Why is he so excited
about this hopeless case? Oh yeah...
T.B. msg #3: Move over St. Jude! Cryonics now has its
_own_ patron saint of lost causes!
. . .
T.B. msg #12: ... and poster boy for "rescue disease".
. . . skip messages . . .
T.B. msg #35: It just keeps on coming!
. . . skip messages . . .
T.B. msg #48: Whoo! Whoo! Record breaker! Master Blaster!
In CryoNet's nearly thirteen year history,
nobody else has achieved such voluminous output.
. . . skip messages . . .
T.B. msg #74: Is he actually writing all this material now or
is he recycling old material? Does it matter?
. . . skip messages . . .
T.B. msg #91: No, he wasn't misbehaving when he posted private
email to CryoNet, because he has his _own_ rules
for social conduct. Somebody remind me never to
get near this guy!
. . . skip messages . . .
T.B. msg #115: Isn't T.B. a disease and isn't it contagious?
. . . skip messages . . .
T.B. msg #127: neurotic = you have a problem that bothers _you_
psychotic = you have a problem that bothers _others_
. . . skip messages . . .
T.B. msg #144: Will this ever stop? It's hard to find the
messages I _want_ to read.
. . . skip messages . . .
T.B. msg #153: Oh, he says that some of his messages have useful
information in them. Then why did he encourage
everyone to skip them by posting so much junk in
the beginning?
. . . skip messages . . .
T.B. msg #178: Something must be done about this!
. . . skip messages . . .
T.B. msg #203: Hey, has the CryoNet administrator been asleep
the past week? What's _his_ problem?
--
Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=16866
Warning: This message was filtered from the daily CryoNet digest
because the poster sent too many messages per digest.
It thus may need to be rated.