X-Message-Number: 171
From ho5cad!att!A.ISI.EDU!TKD Thu May 24 09:05:45 1990
Return-Path: <ho5cad!att!A.ISI.EDU!TKD>
Received: from ho5cad.UUCP by whscad1.att.uucp (4.1/SMI-3.2)
	id AA25947; Thu, 24 May 90 09:05:44 EDT
Received: by att.att.com; Thu May 24 08:51:13 1990
Date: Thu 24 May 90 07:58:11-EDT
From: Thomas Donaldson <>
Subject: Re: cryonics #169 - Legalisms for Donaldson's Suspension
In-Reply-To: Message from "" of Wed 23 May 90 19:02:41-EDT
Message-Id: <>

This is TKD himself, as you see. Your comments are well taken, as a matter
of Fact. As a matter of strategy, though, with the vast majority of doctors
and the entire Society for Cryobiology ranged against us, it doesn't
seem to me (and I'll defer to Ashworth on this, too) wise to try to argue
the case on those grounds to a noncryonicist judge!

Haven't you made your peace with the fact that Law isn't logical?

			Thomas Donaldson
PS: While I am seriously ill I shouldn't be thought of as DISABLED. I'm
still here, working on my job and on cryonics. As you see.

Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=171