X-Message-Number: 17197 From: Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2001 10:59:44 EDT Subject: Re: Ed Reifman -teeth --part1_db.1855f3b4.289d67e0_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 8/3/01 4:00:59 AM Central Daylight Time, writes: > >Dentistry is 'overkilled' with excellent filler materials. The > true breakthroughs, i.e., growing a tooth/treating periodontal disease from > assembler nanotech is perhaps decades away. (Yes, I wish it were sooner) Could you mention an "excellent filler material", please? My quick search of dental literature came up with plastics that are only intended to last 3 years according to their makers, and good old amalgam, which is a total thermal expansion mismatch... obviously I missed the good ones. I would note also that the teeth are supposed to repair themselves somewhat by remineralization, something that could happen with "fillings" based on calcium flouride phosphate/protein, but not with plastic. >> Note: The most common cause of tooth loss, and its attendant problems, is > from periodontitis, or gum disease, in those of us over 30. Green Tea is > of > limited help here, since it cannot adequately break up the > disease-producing > bacteria that reside in calcified colonies on the root surfaces of the > Green tea has been shown to reduce dental caries, though I suppose it mostly helps up on the tooth surfaces. CoQ10 has been shown to reduce periodontal disease. Wouldn't killing the plaque bacteria by vaccine or drug be simpler than assembler nanotech? Have there been any studies on the effects of long-term antibiotic use on decay (on people who were using the drugs for something else)? (You probably just get drug-resistant bacteria in the plaques; just wondering.) Thanks in advance for any info. -Bill Walker --part1_db.1855f3b4.289d67e0_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" [ AUTOMATICALLY SKIPPING HTML ENCODING! ] Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=17197