X-Message-Number: 1781
Date: 20 Feb 93 18:06:51 EST
From: "Allen J. Lopp" <>
Subject: Request for Input: Alcor Finances

Kevin: Please post this to Cryo-Net, do *NOT* post to SCI.CRYONICS.

CryoNet Readers:

I hope I may use Cryo-Net to reach those of you who are already Alcor
suspension members. Those of you who are not interested in the running of
Alcor may want to skip this posting, and please forgive the intrusion.
This comes from Allen Lopp; I am an Alcor Director.

Alcor has some serious money decisions that need to be made quickly. There
is no need for panic or excitement, but there is a need for the Directors
to take action on this matter quickly, probably at the March 7 meeting.
The money numbers are complex, but my question is a matter of principle
and thus I will try to keep this as simple as possible.

The problem is this: Alcor day-to-day operations cost more than the
day-to-day income that we receive to cover such expenses. For the sake of
illustration, let's say the yearly deficit is 100,000 dollars. In the
past several years, we have covered this deficit using money left to
Alcor by Dick Jones. We have only about 400,000 dollars left of his money
to cover such deficits. This last 400,000 was set aside three years ago
to create an Endowment Fund. It was intended that the 400,000 in the
Endowment Fund would be invested, and the interest earnings would help
pay for day-to-day operations of Alcor "ad infinitum".

Alcor has the following options, which are *NOT* mutually exclusive. I
personally think that the best solution may be a combination of these
options:

1) We can dissolve the Endowment Fund and consume the remaining 400,000 of
the Dick Jones gift. Of course, we could spend it fast or slowly so there
is no way to know for sure how long the remaining money might last us,
but I think it is unlikely that it would last us longer than three more
years unless we implement *VERY* effective control mechanisms to make it
last longer.

2) We can keep the Endowment Fund intact and eliminate the deficit by
either:

	2A) Cutting day-to-day operations so that they can be covered by
		current income. If we address the deficit only by cutting
		expenses, cuts will be required in member services (such
		as Cryonics magazine) and may downgrade our suspension 	
		readiness (by eliminating things such as suspension 	
		training). These would be *REALLY* serious cuts.
	2B) Raising revenues. To raise revenues we could:
		2Ba. Ask for more and larger donations from members.
		2Bb. Raise membership dues markedly.
		2Bc. Put less money in the Patient Care Fund and use more
			of the funding for each suspension to support 	
			day-to-day expenses.
		2Bd. Raise suspension funding minimums, and give more to
			day-to-day expenses that way.

That is pretty much the extent of our options, if we rule out unlikely or
risky options such as pursuing a new for-profit activity or hoping that
some wealthy person gives us lots more money (with or without being
suspended). None of those things are going to happen.

To get specific, what would reaction be if I made this proposal at the
next membership meeting:

1) The Endowment Fund is dissolved;

2) 100,000 dollars of the former Endowment Fund is transferred immediately
to the Operating Account to pay current outstanding debts and to
supplement operations until January 1, 1994.

3) The remaining 300,000 shall be renamed the "Richard C. Jones
Continuancy Fund" and remains invested, and 50,000 is transferred from
the Continuancy Fund into the Operating Fund every January 1 for the next
six years to supplement operation expenses.

4) The investment earnings from the Continuancy Fund will be used 50% to
supplement operations, and the other 50% will flow into the Research Fund
in order to get Alcor back into doing (or funding) serious research.

5) Membership dues (a.k.a. Emergency Responsibility Dues) are raised from
288/year to 360/year retroactive to March 1, 1993, a 25% increase. (For
350 members this will yield an additional 18,900 in 1993.) Furthermore,
on January 1, 1994 membership dues will become 450/year, which is another
25% increase. (For 350 members, this will yield 56,700 over current rates
in 1994. This ignores revenue from new members that sign up in '93 and
'94.)

6) An assertive fundraising program is implemented, using an outside
fundraising agency which is paid by commission.

7) A operating expense budget is put into place which implements the goal
that total operating expenses for 1993 shall not exceed total actual
operating expenses for 1992. (*NOT* line-by-line, but total-for-total).

NOTE: After six years, on January 1, 1999, the last 50,000 will be
transferred out of the Continuancy Fund and the Fund will be no more.
Hopefully by then, Alcor will have enough members that our operations
break even or run with a surplus. But we must learn to control expenses
better or that may never happen. Furthermore, there is no guarantee
against further increases in the membership/E.R. dues, but obviously there
is a point where we begin to lose members by raising dues too much.

Members, I and other Alcor leaders will need to study those figures to see
if they are satisfactory to eliminate the operating deficit. The above
proposal is my own, but I have heard other Directors propose parts of the
above or similar things. (Another thing the Directors have been
discussing: Neuro-suspension funding minimum may be increased to 50,000.)
I think it is likely that something along these lines may be enacted
soon. Please give me your feedback. If you don't like this proposal,
please tell me what solution you think is better. If you think this
proposal is appropriate, please tell me this as well. I will share such
feedback with the other Directors.

Best Wishes and Long Life,

Allen J. Lopp
CompuServe 73750,670

Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=1781