X-Message-Number: 17963 Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2001 16:57:55 -0500 From: Kitty Antonik <> Subject: Re: #17953: statins--possible negatives? [Ettinger] References: <> > Message #17953 > From: > Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2001 20:49:16 EST > Subject: statins--possible negatives? > > Recent publicity touts the benefits of statins for risk of heart attack and > stroke.However, a web site called <medicalreasoning.com> contains the > following. Who has written this is undisclosed, or at least I have not been > able to find it. > > >As of this writing, no study has shown statins or any other cholesterol > drugs to lower overall mortality in women > > >No studies have examined the impact of statins in randomized trials in those > over age 75. Epidemiological studies show >higher cholesterol to be > protective, rather than harmful, in this age group, so it cannot be assumed > that lowering >cholesterol confers benefit exceeding risk. Low cholesterol > may be a risk factor for heart arrhythmias, which are the >leading cause of > death if heart attacks occur; and in the elderly, a heart rhythm abnormality > called atrial fibrillation, that >may be increased with low cholesterol, is a > particularly important risk factor for stroke in the older elderly. It is > possible >that there are subgroups of those over age 75 for whom statins > confer benefit exceeding risk, but this has never been >demonstrated. This > would most likely be the case in persons at very high risk of death from > heart disease, who are at >comparatively low risk for other illness and > injury. [snip re. statins] > >Also, a number of studies have shown that people with naturally low > cholesterol, or those on drugs to lower cholesterol, >have higher rates of > death from suicide and accidents. > > Any expert comment? Coincidentally, today (Saturday 11/17) a poster to LEF Forums asked about low cholesterol since his had "plummeted" to 70 mg (he didn't provide sufficient detail; ie. HDL, LDL, triacylglycerols). He also wanted to know the value of cholesterol in maintaining good health. Tom Matthew's response should provide him - and others - with a good understanding of the role of this steroid precursor. http://forum.lef.org/exec/readTopic.cgi?message_id=24193&view=2#24193 Also, the subject of cholesterol and statins have been discussed numerous times from different aspects on several of the 9 forums (24 hits with a search for the two together); July 1999 the first and latest, Nov 13 2001. In addition, a search of Google groups (http://groups.google.com) under sci.life-extension, sci.med.nutriton, and sci.med will turn up many threads on this subject. **Kitty Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=17963