X-Message-Number: 18507 Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2002 10:20:50 -0500 From: Jeffrey Soreff <> Subject: Re: Rebuttal >>>If they then offered to help me psychokinetically move stars in the >>>sky, I would tell them not to worry about THAT. >>Fine, but are you also proposing to reject choices for _other_ people? >Absolutely not. I would personally not use anything past a walking >stick, but if you want to use different stuff, do it then. Much appreciated. >>>I would agree that the path of humanity will be towards great things, >>>but we need to draw the line and not so much as stick our little toes >>>over it. >>Exactly who needs to draw a line for whom, enforced how, and why? >Humanity in general needs to come to the realization that we need >to live as beings that are still recognizably human, long lives or not. "Humanity in general" is composed of 6 billion individuals, who widely disagree with each other. That is why I asked the question about WHO would draw the line, and how it would be enforced upon dissenters. I, personally, dissent from this goal. I agree with you that getting the hardware that we already have working properly is a higher priority, but I also want to keep my options open if some enhancements that I view as useful become available. Judging by past history, some enhancements are also likely to become available _before_ all of the repairs that we'd like to make become possible. Even today, consider that some cosmetic surgery is done, yet there are vast numbers of higher priority capabilities that we'd prefer from medicine - but the cosmetic surgery happens to be so much easier than e.g. curing many cancers, that the cosmetic capabilities arrived first. Best wishes, -Jeff Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=18507