X-Message-Number: 1876 Date: Wed, 3 Mar 93 08:24 PST From: "SSP::SSP::MRGATE::\"A1::HINCKLEYS\""@ada3.ca.boeing.com Subject: CRYONICS How are you percieved? From: NAME: Scott H Hinckley FUNC: B1-B Logistics TEL: 205 720 0734 <HINCKLEYS AT A1 AT SSP> To: ""@@MRGATE Yet another post on the Clarisa Wells 'mystery'... While I have not formed an opinion as to her authenticity at this time, I must point out that you(collective) are not as unknown as you may think. Several times the justification that she knows too much about you has been used as a reason that she is a 'fake'. I would contend that this is invalid. I have been reading this list for some time now and have noticed that many of you are quite open about your personalities and actions. This is in addition to all the postings about someone else's lives that predominate this forum. i believe that it would be possible to gain the insight she has shown through the diligent reading of this list (and all the between the lines info contained therein). This is not to say she is or isn't who she claims to be, just to say that it just may be possible that she is. And now for a personal word from me . Due to the list I have gone from enthusiasm to cautious monitoring in my views on cryonics. I realize that this may be a distorted view of the true state of cryonics, but, 95%+ of the bandwidth here is spent in internal bickering, with probably <1% actual exchange of ideas to improve the field. I expected a wellspring of progressive information on cryonics from this list, it has yet to appear. Instead of careful discussion of how to improve suspensions, based on previous experience, I find personal attacks and mud throwing. Perhaps if I keep reading long enough I may start to truly see hope for advance. !!! DO NOT USE YOUR MAILER'S AUTO-REPLY TO SEND TO ME, IT WILL NOT WORK !!! ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ +1 205 7200734|This message contains nothing| I heart my VW!|other than my opinions. |Copyright 1993 Scott Hinckley [ Scott, the USENET sci.cryonics news group tends to have much lower volume and most of those messages are technical messages. I find it ironic that one of our main concerns during the creation of sci.cryonics was that it would be just the opposite. - KQB ] Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=1876