X-Message-Number: 19169 From: Date: Wed, 29 May 2002 09:58:39 EDT Subject: language corruption --part1_159.e950d5b.2a26388f_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Thomas Donaldson agrees that a small universe is not the same thing as a small dimension, but most writers still speak of "dimensions" as having shape and size, which I believe is nonsense. Language corruption is a disease to which physicists and mathematicians are not immune. A very simple example is in the use of the same units or "dimensions" for two very different quantities, work and torque, both expressed e.g. in "foot-pounds." You will be hard put finding a physics book that really explains the difference. The difference is that "foot" in "foot-pound of work" means the displacement through which the force acts, while "foot" in "foot-pound of torque" means the lever arm, not the same thing at all, even though the same word or symbol is used. Time as a "dimension" has been found useful for a long time, and some of today's workers even talk of more than one time dimension. Yet time and space are profoundly different, even though connected, both mysterious in many ways but time the more mysterious. As for "coiled" time, I leave that to the shamans. Now space "dimensions" again. Consider a "universe" consisting of the surface of a circular cylinder of small diameter and infinite length. Most of today's writers would say one of the dimensions is small and coiled. Not only is that diseased language, but it is not even clear by what criterion the angular coordinate (or the second linear coordinate, if you want to do it that way) can properly be elevated to the status of "dimension." Coordinates, degrees of freedom, and dimensions are all separate and different things, frequently mixed and confused even by the brightest and the best. Robert Ettinger Cryonics Institute Immortalist Society www.cryonics.org --part1_159.e950d5b.2a26388f_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" [ AUTOMATICALLY SKIPPING HTML ENCODING! ] Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=19169