X-Message-Number: 19296 Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2002 00:58:10 -0700 (PDT) From: Jeff Davis <> Subject: Re: Why the moon has round craters Friends, In Message #19284, Subject: Why the moon has round craters. Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2002 11:08:46 -0700, "George Smith", <>, wrote: > Apparently no one knows. <snip> George, you know I'm on your side 99% of the time, but this is a bit silly. Have you really asked the right people? You'll find a list here, http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/LPSC98/pdf/sess04.pdf of people likely to possess the appropriate expertise, which I came up with by doing a google search for "Theory of impact crater formation" Pop off a little email to various of these folks; something like, "Why is it that all impact craters seem to be round, and none seem to be elongated? It seems reasonable that craters from oblique impacts might be elongated, but I've never seen any that were shaped that way. Is there an explanation for this? If this isn't your particular area of expertise, but you know the guy/gal to ask, please tell me who that person is. Thanks. ------------------------- > ...I decided I would ask a friend... Not an entirely unreasonable approach, > (a physicist who asked to not be named) And after seeing his answer, I can understand why. > ...and forwarded him the email. > Here is part of what he wrote back to me: <snip seemingly reasonable stuff until> > "Furthermore, the last I checked, the BOILING point of rock is pretty high. The immense pressure of the entire Earth on its core fails to do anything more than melt it. At which point I gasped, and began to hope, for his sake, that he's not giving up his day job as a UPS driver. Or perhaps--god help us--he works at a nuclear power plant? His name isn't, by any chance, Homer Simpson? Oh, wait a minute, right, Homer's just a cartoon character. Whew, that was scary for a moment. The pressure at the earth's core is not the cause of, and has no bearing on, the temperature of the core (which happens to be solid--not because of the temp, but rather because of the high pressure, and which happens to be iron, not rock). The temp of the core is the result of (1) the initial accumulation of energy during the planet's formation--the accreting material, accelerated as it fell inward, converted its gravitational potential energy to kenetic energy, which, upon impact, was converted to heat,... 4 1/2 billion years ago, and (2) the gradual release of energy from radioactive decay in those intervening 4 1/2 billion years. <snip> > "In short, this fellow doesn't know what he's talking about and probably doesn't realize it." Perfectly describes your 'physicist' (wink, wink) friend. To be a bit more generous, the answer to this question may not lie where one would initally expect to find it, so that first guesses, given in good faith by intelligent and educated persons such as your friend, miss the mark. 'Trick questions' wrongly guessed at don't really reflect badly on the guessers. <snip> > Why does the Moon have round craters? > Apparently no one really knows. Are you sure, George? I still think you haven't looked well enough? By the way, if I were to hazard a guess of my own, after reading only a few paragraphs as I performed that google search earlier, I would say that at the pressures, temperatures, and energies involved in such impacts, the subject materials behave as fluids, wherein will be found the explanation, which is not intuitively expected by the average ponderer. As always, George, I remain an admirer of all those brave souls who, like yourself, dash enthusiastically to the extreme of whatever the limb, passionate to redefine the limits of the possible. Regarding the cryonics endeavor: SUCCESS IS A NEAR CERTAINTY Best, Jeff Davis "My guess is that people don't yet realize how "handy" an indefinite lifespan will be." J Corbally __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=19296