X-Message-Number: 19399 Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2002 06:30:02 -0400 From: Thomas Donaldson <> Subject: CryoNet #19389 - #19396 Hi everyone! For Brett Bellmore: Yes, it will take some empirical experience to decide just what impedes people's acceptance of cryonics. A corollary of this is that a belief that revival of an experimental suspension animal will greatly increase acceptance has no more merit than many other hypotheses. The piece by Bogner was good and interesting, and its view of Accounting puts a new perspective on WORLDCOMM's problems. Could he tell us just what software he is discussing? And what did he do to read up on the subject? One unfortunate possibility, given that he is an engineer, is that many people aren't up to learning enough to do the job themselves... unlike Bogner and many of us. Olaf Henny's piece was very funny, even though its results aren't. Just what was the population this student asked about dihydrogen monoxide? I enjoyed this issue of Cryonet (#19389-#19386) even if several postings weren't "relevant to cryonics". The most relevant one, Bob Ettinger's, made me want to learn more. Best wishes and long long life to all, Thomas Donaldson Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=19399