X-Message-Number: 197 From att!PROOF.ERGO.CS.CMU.EDU!Timothy.Freeman Mon Jul 9 20:32:26 1990 Return-Path: <att!PROOF.ERGO.CS.CMU.EDU!Timothy.Freeman> Received: from att.UUCP by whscad1.att.uucp (4.1/SMI-3.2) id AA22066; Mon, 9 Jul 90 20:32:25 EDT Received: by att.att.com; Mon Jul 9 20:27:29 1990 Received: from proof.ergo.cs.cmu.edu by PROOF.ERGO.CS.CMU.EDU id aa15681; 9 Jul 90 20:26:53 EDT To: Reply-To: Tim Freeman <> Subject: Re: cryonics #194 - Pearson & Shaw Public Comments on Alcor In-Reply-To: Your message of Sun, 08 Jul 90 10:46:10 -0400. <> Date: Mon, 09 Jul 90 20:26:50 EDT Message-Id: <> From: c) he thinks something else better will be available later either from Alcor or a derivative organization Making arrangements with Alcor costs much less than being frozen by Alcor. If Durk signed up with Alcor, and then something better came up, then Durk would only lose his $300 sign-up fee and $200/year during the time he was signed up. He would be able to keep the life insurance or trust fund he set up for paying for his Alcor suspension and use it for whatever better thing came up, assuming he didn't die meanwhile. If he did die before something better came around, then the cryonics arrangements would be a big win. Tim Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=197