X-Message-Number: 19733
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2002 10:00:46 -0400
From: Thomas Donaldson <>
Subject: CryoNet #19720 - #19731

A brief comment on John Grigg's reference to what I said:

Yes, if God was so immature he would certainly believe that it helped
US to worship him. What else would you expect?

As for "transhumanism", I would be the last to argue against improving
ourselves, but any real improvement would have to be tested out in
the real world. On thinking about it, various improvements may only
improve our response to a particular situation, or deal with one
problem by creating another equal one (medicine does create problems,
but they're less than those it solves).

Again, as for AI, it is assumed by those who write about it that
this great machine intelligence will also come with its own desires
and aims. It's far from obvious that this is so, especially if we
simply don't build such a creature. So long as it comes to us for
the desires and aims it should satisfy, it cannot attack us in
any way ... though we may find that our desires are sometimes
contradictory because it discovers that for us. It would still be
WE, then, who must deal with such problems. That would not be an
attack but an illumination.

And finally, as someone who has studied how brains work a lot,
I will add that we're farther than we think from making a machine
that can solve all our problems, whatever they are, except for clearly
defined problems which we gave to it, such as playing chess. And
I mean here rival us in all sides of INTELLIGENCE, not desires or aims.

And finally, who says we aren't already in a social situation
just like we'd get if we all uploaded into the same machine?

		Best wishes and long long life for all,

			Thomas Donaldson

Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=19733