X-Message-Number: 204
From att!A.ISI.EDU!TKD Sun Jul 22 23:41:08 1990
Return-Path: <att!A.ISI.EDU!TKD>
Received: from att.UUCP by whscad1.att.uucp (4.1/SMI-3.2)
	id AA00363; Sun, 22 Jul 90 23:41:07 EDT
Received: by att.att.com; Sun Jul 22 12:37:13 1990
Date: Sun 22 Jul 90 12:35:58-EDT
From: Thomas Donaldson <>
Subject: Re: cryonics #203 - Cryonics and Euthanasia
In-Reply-To: <>
Message-Id: <>

Dear R. Burns:

You've raised some very good points about how Alcor should deal with
these issues in the future.  I personally believe the percentage
[of suspensions before legal "death"] will be well over 15% but that
is a trivial issue.  I also think that we should not get too far ahead
of ourselves: we don't know absolutely that we will win the suit,
nor do we know that the precise law by STate X will be at all friendly
to cryonicists.

			Best and long life,

				Thomas Donaldson

Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=204