X-Message-Number: 206
From att!RELAY.CS.NET!BEATTYR%JLCL01%dupont.com Mon Jul 30 22:06:46 1990
Return-Path: <att!RELAY.CS.NET!BEATTYR%JLCL01%dupont.com>
Received: from att.UUCP by whscad1.att.uucp (4.1/SMI-3.2)
	id AA03395; Mon, 30 Jul 90 22:06:45 EDT
Message-Id: <>
Received: by att.att.com; Mon Jul 30 22:02:08 1990
Received: from relay2.cs.net by RELAY.CS.NET id aa02179; 30 Jul 90 22:00 EDT
Received: from dupont.com by RELAY.CS.NET id ab17997; 30 Jul 90 21:48 EDT
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 90 18:38 EST

From: "Roy Beatty [Keane, Inc.] 609-540-4399 (CHWRKS 'P' P2 Rm 209)" 
Subject: CRYONICS -- No Neck Bolts, Please
To: whscad1!kqb%

I have talked to my wife about cryonics, and she is remarkably 
open minded on the subject.  But she has a strong objection to the 
"neuro option."  She feels that cloning a body to a head is a pretty
tall order, even for future science.

I would approeciate a list of relatively short articles that advocates
of the "neuro option" feel meets this objection.  Our son keeps her
too busy for book-length treatises.

Thanks in advance!

Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=206