X-Message-Number: 21400
From: "Trygve Bauge" <>
References: <>

Subject: Re: Apologies (from the journalist that wrote the Boston Globe article)
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 20:24:15 +0100

To Reilly Capps (freelance reporter for the Boston Globe),
The cryonic suspension of my grandfather is not an ideal one.
But it is the best that could be done in face of the obstacles that have
been present.
I have consistently been open and straight forward with the media about all
the problems involved, as to his age, cause of death, damage after death,
the straight freezing and the storage temperature etc. and all the various
threats to his suspension as these have arised from my sister, the
authorities etc.,

Most of the about 100 people presently frozen have not been suspended under
ideal circumstances.
And even those frozen and maintained with the presently best avialable
techniques have experienced a lot of cellular damage that we presently do
not know how to reverse.

But there are two ways of looking upon this:
One can say: this body will not be alive but like hamburger meat if we just
thaw it out, thus it is a failure,
and make fun of the attempts at bringing back a 89 year old with hearth
problems that then soon would die from other causes,

or we can say as I do say:  What can we possibly do with what we have
preserved to secure the highest degree of continuation of what that once
constituted my grandfather at his best?

At the time of his death we couldn't do anything.
But we anticipated the possibility of cloning.
Know cloning of adult cells have become a reality.
We presentlty are awaiting the development of techniques for cloning or
restoring DNA from
dead organisms. Serious research is presently beeing conducted to restore
the Tasmanian Tiger and the Mammut from specimens stored in alchohol and in
the permafrost respectively.

It is no question in my mind that such techniques will be developed, maybe
in my life time.
Then we could actually clone my grandfather and restore to the clone as much
information about him as can be taught by conventional teaching techniques.
The clone would not be a 89 year old but a baby in a healthy new body,
similar to the body my grandfather had when he originally was a baby.
Thus my attempt is not one of bringing back a 89 year old body with hearth
failure as you implied.

What else can be done with what we have preserved to secure an even greater
degree of continuation of my grandfather?

A clone might eventually be used as a blue print together with nano
technology, to repair individual cells and organs in my grandfather's
original body.

And who are to say that the future might not come up with even other
techniques:

Certainly we would over time get a better understanding of what that
constitutes a human being or its consciousness, and what we actually have to
preserve and repair so to accomplish the survival of one's own sense of
being one-self .

Maybe we only have to preserve or repair the brain or parts of this, maybe
we could just clone or grow individual organs or the rest of the body,
so that the question basically becomes one of growing a brainless clone and
inserting a rebuilt older brain into a clone that  has been grown without a
brain?
Some people are born naturally with little or no brains (no pun intended).
It should be possible to find out what genes has to be turned off to create
a clone without a brain but otherwise healthy.
The cloning part seems possible in our life time,
and with this approach the nano technology part is reduced basically to
repairing individual brain cells and growing a brain from such.
The sliding scale then goes from reparing only one older brain cell to
repairing all the older brain cells, and the degree of continuation of a
human being would then dependend upon the brain's deterioration and our
ability to rebuild brains.

If we have a cloned brain as the blue print, and we do have all the building
blocks of the older brain,
we could possible rebuild the older brain from its individual atoms.
The same atom might not be where it was before, but a similar one would be.

If the blue print brain has been taught as much about the original human
being as we can, then its synapse connections would give a similar mental
experience as was in the original brain, thus the repaired brain rebuilt
after such a cloned and educated copy, would when awakened have a similar
mental experience to what was there before death.

Alternatively: If we use the building blocks from the old brain (pluss what
else might be needed), and build a young uneducated brain (using a cloned
uneducated brain as the blue print) and then teach the rebuilt brain as much
as possible of the information that once was in the old brain, then that too
would be pretty close to restoring Bredo.

Of course this is still not the same as not dying in the first place.
But it is pretty darn close.
And certainly a giant improvement over just becoming dust.

Do we have to have an unbroken line of live cells or repaired and revived
cells, to actually continue to be ourselves? And is our survival of
ourselves dependent upon that as many of our brain cells as possible are
kept alive or repaired and revived?  And how much repair or changes can
there be for the person still to be the same?  Well it is a question of
degree, any improvement above that found in a clone would be a step in the
right direction.

Maybe somewhere along the way we find out that one's sense of being one self
is more a function of the information put into a brain than a function of
the continuation of specific cells in the brain,
and that for all practical purposes with proper teaching a clone could not
be distinguised from the original?

Anyway the sense of continuation would for an onlooker be greater if still
more of the older brain is carried on into the clone. But if the rebuildt
structure ends up being similar to the older structure, there might not be a
need for each atom or molecule to be in the same place, as long as each
older molecule is replaced with a similar molecule. maybe all that is needed
is for the cell pattern and the synapses to be similar, so that it doesn't
really matter if the molecules are moved around a lot.

It seems to me that there are many ways whereby one can restore human
beings,
ways that could be used to even restore those that have become dust:
All it would take is to look at their off spring and recalculate their
DNA/genome, and calculate theoretically what their DNA/genome would have
been like.
Maybe some day we can create new embryoes that fit any desired theoretical
DNA/genome.
Then one could restore all the various human DNA or genome combinations that
have ever lived.

Of a person's mental content, much is human all to human or shared with all
human beings,
a lot is shared with many that lived at the same time and location, and can
be restored from open history records, Some is personal but can be restored
from diarys, family albums etc.
And even the part of a human being that is specific to just it, can easily
be recorded or restored:
if one takes the time to gather an overview over that person: what motivated
it, its aspirations, wills, goals, philosophy, moral system, legal system,
profession, ventures, achievments and way of life.

We have preserved a lot of this from my grand father's life.
Thus the odds are that we at one point once it becomes technically possible
to clone DNA from dead tissue, and legal and affordable to clone human
beings,
that we then will be able to create a clone that for all practical purposes
is so close to him that it itself would look upon itself as being a
continuation of him.

This is something that we very well might accomplish thanks to our present
preservation methods,
and something that is not dependent upon freezing a body in such a way that
it will walk once you just thaw it out.
The latter would be nice too.
But there are different ways to accomplish similar results.

My grandfather's case is a pilot case,  it has and will contine to lead to
improvements that will benefit many others. Some of the problems we have
faced and overcome are: cryonic organizations that did not accept post
mortem sign ups, political opposition from local town board etc.

The INS and the protectionism still so prevalent in the United States is
still preventing me from getting back to the United states and there
developing my Rocky Mountain Cryonic facility, along the plans published in
the immortalist in 1993.

However, I am still present in Colorado by Proxy: My icebathing club (the
Boulder Polar Bear Club) just celebrated its 20th anniversary with 450
icebathers on new Year's day, the Nederland Area Chamber of commerce  just
had its second annual Frozen Dead Guy days, Bo is still adding dry ice on my
grandfather, and sooner or later someoone will probably pick up on the fire
proof, earth quake proof, storm proof and nuclear war proof design and
technology of my unfinished cryonics facility, and create a business out of
building such houses. Every year thousands of houses burn down in the
Western United states due to forest fires, and someone is probably bright
enough to see that these would not have burnt down if they had been built
with the technologies I was the first to combine.

It would have been nice if you had focused on what I actually am trying to
accomplish, the actual rationale that is behind my actions, the value my
pilot project has to other later cryonic cases (opening up for better
routines and more rights respect), the valueable aspects of my unfinished
state of the art  facility.How life-extensioin and entrepreneurial liberty
go hand in hand. The harmfull effects of protectionisme, and the importance
of deporting the border patrol, when it comes to greatly extending the human
life-expectancy.
---

Reilly, you wrote a fun article, like the Beeck sisters made a fun movie.
But both they and you have shown a large disregard for the facts of the
case,
and in many ways misrepresented what we actually are doing.
It maybe looks funnier that way and sells better.

But the reality of the case is actually that what we are doing is a rational
attempt at preserving my grand father's dead body,  And that the odds of
actually restoring him to close to his own peak health is quite good.

I would have liked you to focus your article more on the rational techniques
whereby this possibly can be done,

Sincerely,

Trygve Bauge


Ps. I am posting this response to the Cryonet letter circle, since many of
its readers might have read your article that appeared in the Boston Globe
on Tuesday the 11th of March 2003.


----- Original Message -----
From: "rodrigez rodrigez" <>
To: <>
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 11:58 PM
Subject: Apologies


> Tryvge,
>
> I want to apologize to you for not getting back to you
> sooner. I've been away from home and haven't checked
> my messages. When I did, I was shocked to find so many
> messages from you, expressing problems with the
> article. I was trying to write in the spirit of the
> festival, which was lighthearted and fun, and I'm
> sorry if I offended you. I admire your spirit and
> dedication to life extension, even while I'm unsure
> about your methods perhaps made light of them. Again,
> the festival was a fun thing, and I tried to write a
> fun article about it, something that would make the
> readers of Boston laugh. Sorry if you took offense.
>
> Thanks for all the help with the article,
>
> Reilly Capps
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Web Hosting - establish your business online
> http://webhosting.yahoo.com

Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=21400