X-Message-Number: 21553 Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2003 13:45:34 -0400 (EDT) From: Charles Platt <> Subject: trust References: <> > (Brian) wrote me privately on Jan. 10, 2003 reiterating the successful > transplantation results from -50 degC that were reported at the Alcor > conference. Thanks Bob for graciously agreeing that your previous statement on this topic was not quite correct. To the person who asked me to post info about vitrification research: First, it's not my research and I do not feel it's appropriate for me to talk about it. Second, I am bound by a nondisclosure agreement anyway. Therefore the best I can do is ask questions of anyone who purports to know about it. As for the more pertinent issue of applying "untested" methods to cryopatients: Since all the people who make decisions on technical issues at Alcor are signed up to be cryopreserved by Alcor, they have an obvious incentive to verify that our methods are beneficial. For this reason (and others) I have visited the lab many times where our vitrification solution was developed, am well acquainted with the two principal researchers, and have satisfied my own concerns. I assume that Alcor members are aware of this situation, and trust us to protect their brains as we would wish to protect our own. In the meantime we release as much information as we can, pending the resolution of patent issues. The information has included the brain micrographs which Bob complained were insufficient proof of the vitrification solution. Of course I would like to provide more detailed research results, but some brain micrographs are better than no brain micrographs. In any case CI may find itself in a similar situation, since I note its most recent issue of The Immortalist places an embargo on revelations about Yuri Pichugin's research, until patient issues have been dealt with. Thus all members of cryonics organizations are required to trust the organizations in the absence of full disclosure. Ironically (in view of Bob's complaints) CI actually requires more trust from its members than Alcor, because its protocol has not been as fully documented and its case reports (with the exception of one from Ben Best) have included virtually no details of procedures and their success or lack thereof. I'm sure this will be viewed as yet another contentious claim, but it is self-evidently true to anyone who has read Alcor News vs. The Immortalist. --CP Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=21553