X-Message-Number: 22131
From: "michaelprice" <>
References: <>
Subject: The end of Infinity
Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2003 11:52:43 +0100

Peter Merel.

>> ... if we increase the detector's sensitivity sufficiently.
> 
> You agree you can't achieve this, but insist it's unquestionable.
> I won't argue with faith, so will let the matter drop.

You must have misunderstoof me, since I do not agree that 
increasing the detector's sensitivity sufficiently is unachievable.

>> energy is proportional to their frequency.  Single photons 
>> dislodge single electrons, so there is no ambiguity about 
>> their existence.
> 
> Ignoring entanglement ... 

I've ignored entanglement becaise I don't believe it to be 
relevant.  Just IHMO, of course.

> but that's more relevant to popular theory 
> than the exigence of its reformulation. So I'll just thank 
> you for the interesting conversation.
 
Likewise.

Cheers,
Michael C Price
----------------------------------------
http://mcp.longevity-report.com
http://www.hedweb.com/manworld.htm

Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=22131