X-Message-Number: 22135
From: 
Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2003 01:41:34 EDT
Subject: Cryonic alternative to live birth

--part1_1e8.c7ca5dd.2c39108e_boundary
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


Subject: Cryonic alternative to live birth

If cryonics were commonly offered as the alternative to live birth, it might 
benefit cryonics several ways. There have already been not yet born 

transplanted to cryonic storage and them re-implanted even years later, carried 
to term 
and born. It does work and proves the cryonics point 
with undeniable living human results now rather than years from now.
If that choice were mandated as a choice, more overall dollars and 
research would go toward cryonics. A few not yets might effectively 
time travel a bit and be born, some might not, but storage technologies
and those types of resuscitations would make gains in either case. 
We might have to work on the front end life extending to make progress.
Who among us wants to have the early experimental resuscitations done
on us and risk falling into the statistical column under botched 
resuscitation?
At least the little ones gain some kind of a chance they wouldn't have 

otherwise had, and such a chance possibility is probably better on the emotions 
and 
psyche of many instead of no chance at all. It's very hard for people to say 
cryonics doesn't make sense when living children who were frozen for years are 
born and running around healthy with 70+ more years ahead of them.  

--part1_1e8.c7ca5dd.2c39108e_boundary

 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"

[ AUTOMATICALLY SKIPPING HTML ENCODING! ] 

Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=22135