X-Message-Number: 22178 From: Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 16:13:06 EDT Subject: Re: Time Travel There are serious and reputable physicists who think time travel is possible, and their ideas for ways to do it are reported from time to time in Scientific American and other periodicals. The latest Wired (Aug. 2003), for example, summarizes four methods. Granted, Wired is purposely sensational and S.A. is not as solid as it used to be, but the scientists and their ideas are serious. The ideas are wildly impractical for now, usually requiring the manipulation of black holes or superstrings, but I think they are generally accepted as possible. Will future genius manage the engineering? I think it probable -- most things we have tried to engineer in the past we have succeeded at -- but of course we cannot know. As for the usual paradox of killing your grandfather etc., the latest answer I read is that you just can't. The laws would say that if your ship went forward in time through a black hole, and then tried to return and collide with yourself going in, the hole would just eject you to one side so you didn't hit. And nothing you could do, nothing that would change that loop, would work -- it would be like trying to scratch your right elbow with your right hand -- it just can't be done no matter how you twist, for deep reasons regarding the geometry of your bones. Of course, it's easier to observe the past (e.g., to record the state of Alexander's brain) than to go back and change it. There is no paradox involved in that. Every night we see stars as they were thousands or millions of years ago, when the light left. Not that I have any idea how to see details from Alexander's time, but that is just a practical problem, not an innate physical impossibility. BTW, someone mentioned curled dimensions. I believe the way to understand what the theorists are trying to describe is to think of Flatland, a plane where Mr. Square lives, as a plane figure might reside on a piece of paper. Square thinks he lives in a two dimensional world, but someone might point out to him that he does have *some* thickness -- just very little. The third dimension in Flatland has been crushed down to almost nothing. In the same way, the theorists think there is a larger universe with many dimensions --11, 27, who knows -- but in our universe these are very "thin" as I would say, or "coiled up" as they do. In any event, such hard-to-explain phenomena as Bell's Paradox (the influence of one entangled particle on its partner, which seems to go far faster than light, and by the latest measurements, thousands of times faster at least) -- these phenomena show there is still much to discover about the fundamental nature of our universe. Until we understand that better, it is far to early to say that something like time travel cannot be done. Alan Mole Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=22178