X-Message-Number: 22570
From: "Mark Plus" <>
Subject: Some Officials Want State Regulation Of Cryonics Firm
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 09:15:03 -0700

http://www.azcapitoltimes.com/main.asp?SectionID=2&SubSectionID=2&ArticleID=275

Some Officials Want State Regulation Of Cryonics Firm
New York, Florida Have Laws Overseeing Industry

By Phil Riske


The Scottsdale cryonics facility that a leading sports magazine reported 
severed the head from the body of the late baseball great Ted Williams 
should be regulated by the state, officials say.

But  We can t touch them,  said Rudy Thomas, director of the Arizona Board 
of Funeral Directors and Embalmers.

Mr. Thomas says Alcor Life Extension Foundation, which preserves bodies in 
liquid nitrogen tanks in hopes they might someday be revived, is regulated 
by the federal Uniform Anatomical Gifts Act, which guides the operations of 
organ donation organizations and research labs. Arizona has a similar 
anatomical gift statute, but the state has no regulatory authority over 
Alcor, he said.

The gift act allows Alcor to acquire full legal custody over a body.

The Arizona Anatomical Gift Act covers facilities  licensed, accredited or 
approved under the laws of any state for storage of human bodies and parts  
and states that hospitals, organ procurement agencies and accredited medical 
and dental schools may accept anatomical gifts  for transplantation, 
therapy, medical or dental science. 

Mr. Thomas told the St. Petersburg Times the Food and Drug Administration 
has regulatory authority over cryonics facilities, but does not perform 
regular inspections.

Kathleen Quinn of the agency s public affairs office told Arizona Capitol 
Times the agency oversees  medical gases  that are used in cryonics labs, 
but said it was unclear whether the FDA has overall regulatory authority 
over Alcor.

If the Sports Illustrated report about Alcor s treatment of Mr. Williams s 
remains is true, said Mr. Thomas, the facility is guilty of mutilation. 
Arizona law prohibits mutilation of a body. Among several allegations made 
by Larry Johnson, a former Alcor employee, are that Alcor severed Mr. 
Williams s head, drilled holes in it and fractured the skull, the magazine 
reported.

 That to me is mutilation, if it happened,  Mr. Thomas said.

Mr. Johnson also said Alcor took DNA samples from Mr. Williams, but lost 
them.

Alcor has denied Mr. Johnson s statements and has never acknowledged that 
Mr. Williams s remains are at its facility.

Alcor sued Mr. Johnson, alleging breach of contract and theft of company 
property. He has until Sept. 20 to respond to the suit.

Bill Could Be Introduced Next Session

Paula Lemler, Alcor media representative, said she did not know the answers 
to several questions asked by Arizona Capitol Times about regulations the 
facility is subject to, nor about whether any investigations of Alcor were 
taking place. She said retiring Alcor CEO Dr. Jerry Lemler, who is her 
husband, would respond the newspaper s questions  when he has time. 

Mr. Thomas said he informed Lynette Evans, Governor Napolitano s policy 
adviser for regulatory matters, of his concerns about Alcor, and Rep. Bob 
Stump, R-Dist. 9, says he will introduce a bill next session to regulate 
anatomical research facilities and companies that handle the donation of 
human bodies and body parts.

New York and Florida have enacted laws regulating the cryonics industry, Mr. 
Thomas said, and California and Michigan have applied existing statutes to 
oversee the industry.

Michigan last month prohibited the Cryonics Institute of Michigan from 
performing procedures at its facility until it conforms to regulations 
intended for mortuaries and cemeteries.

An Alcor newsletter published on the Internet Sept. 1 argued against 
applying mortuary and cemetery regulations to cryonics companies.

  We are a research institution receiving anatomical donations under the 
Uniform Anatomical Gift Act we should not be subject to mortuary regulations 
that enforce procedures such as embalming,  the newsletter stated.  Cemetery 
regulations are equally inappropriate We cannot maintain patients in 
hermetically sealed containers (as specified by Arizona mortuary law) since 
venting is necessary to allow liquid nitrogen vapor to escape. 

Mr. Stump, a first-term House member from the West Valley and whose father 
owned a mortuary in California said,  We need to ensure that families have 
adequate options if their loved ones  remains are mishandled by anyone. And 
we need to ensure that we have proper mechanisms in place for families to 
file complaints. 

Mark Ferrell, who is married to Mr. Williams s eldest daughter, Bobby-Jo; 
Buzz Harmon, a former director of the Ted Williams Museum in Citrus, Fla., 
and at least four people responding to a call for an investigation into the 
Alcor-Williams matter by a Web site called  Save Ted  have filed complaints 
against Alcor with the Arizona Attorney General s Office.

Dianna Jennings, a spokeswoman for the office, said there are no records 
indicating an investigation has begun.  We re not the people s attorney,  
she said. Last month, Attorney General Terry Goddard would neither confirm 
nor deny his office was investigating Alcor.

Who Regulates?

Governor Napolitano declined to comment on Alcor at her Sept. 16 news 
briefing.

Other governmental agencies also said they do not have regulatory authority 
over Alcor s operations, including the Department of Health Services; the 
Maricopa County Attorney s Office, unless  criminal activities  take place 
at the facility, said spokesman Bill Fitzgerald; the Maricopa County Public 
Health Department and the city of Scottsdale. None reported receiving 
complaints about Alcor.

According to this month s Alcor newsletter, the company has recently 
undergone inspections by fire officials and the state Department of 
Environmental Quality and has requested an inspection by OSHA.

 We expect to be scrutinized after the Sports Illustrated article appeared,  
the newsletter said.

DHS issued  transit permits  for moving 10 bodies from Alcor s previous 
facility in Riverside, Calif. to Scottsdale in 1994.

 To the best of our knowledge, we have had no  complaints, no 
investigations,  said Diana Eckles of the DHS division that handles 
laboratory licensure and certification.

A 1993 memorandum written by former Alcor president Steve Bridge discussed a 
meeting in Phoenix among Alcor, DHS and attorney general representatives.

 We were expecting the meeting to resolve the last of the paperwork problems 
necessary to begin the move to Scottsdale,  Mr. Bridge wrote.

The memo, which is posted on the Internet, goes on to describe Mr. Bridge s 
perspective of DHS concerns about preservation of bodies of people who die 
from highly communicable diseases and storage of bodies in liquid nitrogen.

Before Alcor moved from California, the company won a court case in 1990 
against the California Department of Health Services, which had refused to 
issue death certificates and body disposition permits for those who wanted 
their bodies frozen after death.

The state had refused to issue death certificates, which relatives often 
needed to settle estates and obtain insurance payments. Additionally, 
 patients,  as Alcor describes people who donate their bodies to the 
non-profit foundation, often turn over their life insurance policies to 
Alcor to cover the costs of freezing and storage (anywhere from $100,000 for 
a whole body to $30,000 for only a head, according to the Los Angeles 
Times).

In his written opinion, Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Aurelo Munoz added 
that if California wanted to regulate the cryonics industry, it first must 
set up licensing and regulatory procedures.

What Lawmakers Say

Rep. Wally Straughn, D-Dist. 15, says Arizona needs to look at regulating 
the cryonics industry.  New technologies will likely offer options for the 
deceased that we have yet to consider,  he said, adding that options for 
those who might be revived from a frozen state also need to be considered.

 We really need to start working on guidelines before companies like Alcor 
proliferate,  Mr. Straughn said.

Rep. Phil Hanson, R-Dist. 9, disagrees.

 I m not sure that I would give great support to a bill placing regulations 
on cryonics companies at this time,  he said.  It is such a small facility 
and those that are considering the process should be made aware of the pros 
and cons by the company as a good business practice. 

Mr. Thomas has called for the creation of a state level board to regulate 
Alcor, but Rep. Linda Gray, R-Dist. 10, said,  It is a good idea to bring 
this company under the regulation of the funeral directors instead of 
creating another board. 

Mr. Stump said he also wants to bring the regulation of cemeteries under the 
state Board of Funeral Directors and Embalmers, rather than the Board of 
Real Estate.

Mr. Thomas put aside the belief among Alcor supporters that medical 
scientists someday might be able to revive bodies that have been frozen for 
years.

 There s no difference between cryonics and cremation,  he said.  You re 
gone forever.   

_________________________________________________________________
Add MSN 8 Internet Software to your existing Internet access and enjoy 
patented spam protection and more.  Sign up now!   
http://join.msn.com/?page=dept/byoa

Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=22570