X-Message-Number: 23969 Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 11:55:12 -0700 Subject: new "rating" system From: Kennita Watson <> Not a rating system, but a classification system. And a flawed system, because a single item can have multiple classifications. Many is the message I have seen that is insightful, interesting, informative, and offtopic at once. Or redundant and funny. Or informative and flamebait. Or... you get the picture. I had expected the rating to be from 1 to 10. On the methods: I'm not fond of needing to open a browser window to do ratings. What if I could cut and paste the Cryonet headers into a message to "" and append a number (or letter, or number-letter combination, depending on how complicated you wanted to make it) in angle brackets (which aren't used in the headers yet) for the messages I wanted to rate? Like so: #77777: Message Subject #1 [Joe CryonetUser] <5> #77778: Message Subject #2 [Jane Cryonetist] <5> #77779: Message Subject #3 [Jim Cryoneticist] ... Even if we kept the browser window, an eleven-digit rater code seems excessive. A four-digit number would allow for plenty of growth (and I would have a chance of remembering it). All in all, I rate the rating system a 2 (I'm sure there's a worse one, but I can't think of what it is). On further reflection, I think the whole rating system is a bad idea. It seems to be an obtrusive, blanket, omnipresent solution to an intermittent annoyance (I don't consider it serious enough to merit the term "problem"). Kennita Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=23969