X-Message-Number: 24254 From: "G. Urban" <> Subject: An innovation in cryonics Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2004 16:16:29 +0200 I have an idea about cryonics. The main problem with cryonics is, that people don't realize, that the frozen (and vitrified) patients are alive. The main aim of cryonics research therefore must be, to verify the viability of a deep cooled whole CNS. It is not enough to verify the viability of a hyppocampal slice, although it's much easier to do because of higher relative surface. All people would agree, that a simple injection is non-fatal, although most people think, that freezing is fatal. What if you would amplify the relative surface ratio of a brain by using the very conservative method of ijection? Of course, many injections at a time. You could inject the perfusion agents directly into the brain, thus achieving a perfect distribution of the chemicals, which can even be specially mixed for each different part of the brain. Unfortunately many blood vessels will be hurt, but this, together with those cells, that were directly hurt, is much lesser damage, than frost-related cell damage. (I mean, biologically, maybe it does some informatical damage, but every brain surgery does. If the injection needles are small enough, the info and blood vessel damage would be relatively small.) Even a short viability after resuscitation in a brain of an experimental animal would clearly show, that cryo patients are living persons, and therefore it would basically redefine the status and acceptance of cryonics. But even long viability can be achieved after resuscitation, and _without any nanotechnology_, because the hurted blood vessels could be artificially closed with some kind of surgical glue, when the needles are taken out of the brain. (This would only happen after rewarming. The needles are frozen /I mean, vitrified/ into the brain.) The process is appx. as following: 1.:Initial cooling and washout of the blood. 2.: While the needles are slowly moved into the brain, cryoprotectants are pumped in through the needles, and maybe water would be removed through every second needle. 3.: Cooling. This could preferably happen by the flow of a cooling agent (even a gas) through the needles. The needles, of course, are already fully crossing the brain at that time, and they can get closer to each other, as the brain is shrinking. There can be problems, because of the different shrinking rate of the brain and the needles, but these can be solved. The brain looses the heat at all places with the same speed, so there are no inner cracks. (The flowing direction of the cooling agent must be changed, each time there are temperature asimmetries.) 4.: Storage (With the needles left in the brain) 5.: Resuscitation. This is appx. the opposite of the above mentioned procedures. 5./1.: Initial Rewarming (Preferably with gas through the needles.) 5./3.: Chemical threatment from the point of thawing until the achievement of the minimal temperature of viability. (Preferably somewhat below body temperature.) 5./4.: Removal of the needles while injecting a surgical glue to close the blood vessels. 5./5.: Reperfusion with blood. (5./6.: Rejoining with a cloned or robotic body, this is yet impossible, although a brain transplant to a body of a brain-dead person is not science fiction.) I hope this idea can help the science of cryonics. _________________________________________________________________ MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=24254