X-Message-Number: 24804 From: Subject: Re: Reply to Aubrey de Grey Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 00:51:31 US/Eastern Aubrey de Grey wrote: > Fair enough... By "partisan" I only meant "representing the respective > organisations" -- of course the less partisan the people actually feel, > the better. But if there's too much acrimony right now for such people > (you and Tanya, maybe?) to carry their respective boards with them, then > yes, now is evidently not the time. As I said, Aubrey, with respect to relations with Alcor my views are not representative of the CI Board, therefore I cannot represent CI in these matters. And I am against the comparisons document in the first place -- also not representative of most of the CI Directors and Advisors -- but no one is going to force me to produce one. Joe Waynick wrote: > Ben, you misunderstand me. The entire comparison fiasco is trivial. I > won't respond because we both have more important things to do. Mr. Ettinger > may not be on speaking terms with me, (I don't know that for a fact), but I > certainly have no difficulty speaking with him on substantive issues. Nor do > I have any difficulty cooperating with CI on mutually beneficial > arrangements that help all cryonicists. Thank you for these comments, Joe. I am sorry if I misunderstood you and even more sorry if I misrepresented you. -- Ben Best Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=24804