X-Message-Number: 26127 From: "John de Rivaz" <> References: <> Subject: Re: Information Paradigm Date: Tue, 3 May 2005 14:38:52 +0100 But David Deutsch also wrote that it is not possible to simulate zero-G flying in an electromechanical flight simulator, even though other sensations of flight can be simulated. The simulation of sleep poses a philosophical dilemma. If the subject actually goes to sleep in the simulated world, surely he goes to sleep in the real world as well, therefore it is not a simulation. Death can be simulated by a "game over - you lose" notice, and the program can even refuse to accept the same player with a different identity, but annihilation is just that, there is no way to simulate it. It is real or it doesn't happen. -- Sincerely, John de Rivaz: http://John.deRivaz.com for websites including Cryonics Europe, Longevity Report, The Venturists, Porthtowan, Alec Harley Reeves - inventor, Arthur Bowker - potter, de Rivaz genealogy, Nomad .. and more Mike Perry wrote in cryonet, http://www.cryonet.org >> Message #26123 Date: Mon, 02 May 2005 22:16:09 -0700 From: Mike Perry <> Subject: Re: Information Paradigm References: <> Robert Ettinger writes: >In broader terms, the "information paradigm" is only a >conjecture--entertained >by some very bright people, but in my opinion pretty low on the plausibility >scale. After all, it not only fails to answer the ontological questions, but >does >not even address them. Some interesting writings based on quantum mechanics have a bearing on this issue. As one example, David Deutsch in *The Fabric of Reality* devotes considerable space to arguing that a universal reality generator (as he calls it) is possible, that is to say, physically realizable. This would be essentially a type of quantum computer but capable of simulating a human brain and giving it the experience of any given, physically realizable environment, when suitably programmed. I won't try to get into any deep ontological discussions here, but just note that the discrete nature of happenings at the quantum level lends itself to computational (information-based) interpretations--or so it appears. Mike Perry << Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=26127