X-Message-Number: 26585 Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2005 04:54:18 -0700 (PDT) From: "D. den Otter" <> Subject: Re: Response to D. den Otter "Mathew Sullivan" <> wrote: <<Speaking for myself In the case of my father who died of a sudden heart attack, I was fortunate to get the pathologist to remove the brain for free since the option for autopsy was already available.>> Yes, this option should be available in many hospitals around the (Western) world. Arrangements or at least inquiries should be made in advance, if possible. Btw, why did the brain have to be removed? This doesn't sound like a standard cryonics procedure. <<Efforts were made to minimize damaged during the removal process, but I was less than pleased as a result of the damage done from saw cuts.>> This kind of damage is probably quite trivial compared to that caused by warm ischemia, the suspension process itself, and whatever degradation may happen during long term storage. Indeed, you could even plastinate or fix & freeze dry brain slices instead of whole brains, see: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/dsp.cgi?msg=17457 http://www.kfunigraz.ac.at/anawww/plast/p35.html http://www.kfunigraz.ac.at/anawww/plast/e12.html Clean, straightforward cuts etc. will presumably be easy to repair with nanotech and similar advanced techniques. In any case, the aim is to preserve information, not a functioning brain. <<In light of the various brain surgeries that go on these days, I m sure there have to be less damaging ways to remove the brain.>> No doubt, but we also need to keep it simple and affordable. This means not looking gift brain extractions too deeply in the mouth, among other things. This is the poor man's ambulance to the future; no room for fancy equipment and protocols, just the bare basics. <<I would caution against room or refrigerated storage due to the lack of supporting evidence for long-term storage,>> Well, plastinates and even freeze dried animals can apparently be kept at RT for many years without visible degradation. Keeping them at -20*C or so, in a dark, airtight container should significantly extend their already impressive (decades at the very least in the case of plastination) shelf life. And, again, the aim is to develop an affordable procedure, not an optimal one. Personally I firmly believe that even relatively crude methods like plastination and freeze drying will preserve enough structural data for a successful identity reconstruction, certainly when combined with DNA samples, video recordings, writings, and other external information sources. Collection and storage of said data sources should be an integral part of the procedure. <<but you may want to make a mental note that we have evidence of vitrification after fixation with 7 months of diffusing cryoprotectant into the brain.>> You mean that (non-toxic, non-flammable) cryoprotectant could be used instead of formaldehyde etc. for fixation? And the cryo-fixed specimen could then be freeze dried to get rid of residual water? That would certainly be interesting... <<I m sure we will get around to writing an article at some point for the magazine, but there are plenty of other projects needing attention these days.>> I understand that you have other priorities, but Alcor or the other organizations could also assist in less labor intensive ways, by 'donating' some floorspace for storage freezers, for example. Finding a place where we can legally store human brains would -presumably- be one of the greatest challenges, after all. As mentioned before, the cheap emergency alternatives could be promoted via a separate non-profit outfit for legal / PR reasons, if so desired, with the cryo org simply renting out a room to a fellow preservation provider. Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=26585